CIS Controls v8vsDORA
See exactly how CIS Controls v8 controls map to DORA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which DORA controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CIS Controls v8 maps to DORA with 31% coverage across 48 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls identifies 105 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CIS Control 16: Application Software Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 153 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 68 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
CIS Control 1: Inventory and Control of Enterprise Assets(1 mappings)
CIS Control 11: Data Recovery(7 mappings)
CIS Control 12: Network Infrastructure Management(2 mappings)
CIS Control 13: Network Monitoring and Defense(5 mappings)
CIS Control 14: Security Awareness and Skills Training(2 mappings)
CIS Control 15: Service Provider Management(3 mappings)
+48 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The CIS Controls v8 to DORA crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which DORA controls your existing CIS Controls v8 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
10 of 26 DORA controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CIS Controls v8. 16 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Centralised security event alerting is the detection process enabling timely response.
Grounded in CIS-13.1 Centralize Security Event Alerting. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Specified smaller and non-interconnected financial entities are subject to a simplified ICT risk management framework with proportionate requirements (sound systems, monitoring, business continuity, incident handling and testing).
Every one of the 10 evidenced controls and 16 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 31% in the header counts how many CIS Controls v8 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many DORA controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other CIS Controls v8 comparisons
Other DORA comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CIS Controls v8 and DORA?
CIS Controls v8 has 153 controls across its framework, while DORA covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 48 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CIS Control 16: Application Software Security, where 13 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct DORA equivalent.
How many controls map between CIS Controls v8 and DORA?
Of 153 total CIS Controls v8 controls, 48 map directly to DORA controls, representing 31% coverage. The remaining 105 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CIS Controls v8 to DORA?
105 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct equivalent in DORA. The highest concentration of gaps is in CIS Control 16: Application Software Security with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CIS Controls v8 and DORA?
The domain with the highest gap count is CIS Control 16: Application Software Security (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.