Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsDORA

See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to DORA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

79
Controls Mapped
221
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which DORA controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to DORA with 19% coverage across 57 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 300 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 263 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in SC - System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 300 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 79 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

AC - Access Control(2 mappings)

NIST800-AC-21Information Sharing. Enable authorized users to determine whether access authorizations assigned to a sharing partner match the information's access and use restrictions for [organization-defined] ; and Employ [organization-defined] to assist users in making information
DORA-Art.45Information-sharing arrangements on cyber threat information and intelligence
NIST800-AC-3Access enforcement
DORA-Art.9Protection and prevention

AT - Awareness and Training(2 mappings)

NIST800-AT-2Literacy training and awareness
DORA-Art.13Learning and evolving
NIST800-AT-3Role-based training
DORA-Art.13Learning and evolving

AU - Audit and Accountability(1 mappings)

NIST800-AU-6Audit record review, analysis, and reporting
DORA-Art.10Detection

CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring(7 mappings)

NIST800-CA-2Control assessments3 targets
DORA-Art.24General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing
DORA-Art.27Requirements for testers for the carrying out of TLPT
DORA-Art.6ICT risk management framework
NIST800-CA-5Plan of action and milestones
DORA-Art.50Administrative penalties and remedial measures
NIST800-CA-7Continuous monitoring
DORA-Art.10Detection
NIST800-CA-8Penetration testing2 targets
DORA-Art.25Testing of ICT tools and systems
DORA-Art.26Advanced testing of ICT tools, systems and processes based on TLPT

CM - Configuration Management(2 mappings)

NIST800-CM-6Configuration settings
DORA-Art.9Protection and prevention
NIST800-CM-8System component inventory
DORA-Art.8Identification

CP - Contingency Planning(6 mappings)

NIST800-CP-1Policy and procedures for contingency planning
DORA-Art.12Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery
NIST800-CP-10System recovery and reconstitution2 targets
DORA-Art.11Response and recovery
DORA-Art.12Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery
NIST800-CP-2Contingency plan2 targets
DORA-Art.11Response and recovery
DORA-Art.16Simplified ICT risk management framework
NIST800-CP-4Contingency plan testing
DORA-Art.11Response and recovery

+59 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to DORA crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which DORA controls your existing NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into DORA
53.8%

14 of 26 DORA controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. 12 are genuine gaps.

72.7%DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management
50%DORA Chapter IV: Digital Operational Resilience Testing
66.7%DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection
25%DORA Chapter III: ICT-Related Incident Management
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-20. 78 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: DORA-Art.10 Detection

Continuous monitoring with defined metrics and response actions is the ongoing detection process.

Grounded in NIST800-CA-7 Continuous monitoring. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: DORA-Art.14 Communication

Financial entities shall have crisis communication plans enabling responsible disclosure of major ICT-related incidents or vulnerabilities to clients, counterparts and the public as appropriate, and designate communication policies for...

Every one of the 14 evidenced controls and 12 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

DORA into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to DORA
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 19% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many DORA controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and DORA?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 300 controls across its framework, while DORA covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 57 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SC - System and Communications Protection, where 43 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct DORA equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and DORA?

Of 300 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 57 map directly to DORA controls, representing 19% coverage. The remaining 263 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to DORA?

263 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in DORA. The highest concentration of gaps is in SC - System and Communications Protection with 43 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and DORA?

The domain with the highest gap count is SC - System and Communications Protection (43 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.