Cross-Framework Mapping

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for AviationvsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security

See exactly how FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls map to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

42
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
47%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation maps to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security with 47% coverage across 21 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 42 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Management(12 mappings)

AESCSF-RM-2Risk Assessment Process2 targets
NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control
NIST82-OVR-01OT System Characterization
CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process2 targets
NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment
NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment2 targets
NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment
NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
NIST82-RM-01OT-Specific Risk Management Framework
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management2 targets
NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment
NIST82-RM-01OT-Specific Risk Management Framework
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
NIST82-RM-01OT-Specific Risk Management Framework
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment2 targets
NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment
NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment

Cybersecurity Governance(8 mappings)

FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities2 targets
NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment
NIST82-RM-02OT Security Program Management
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
NIST82-RM-01OT-Specific Risk Management Framework
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment2 targets
NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment
NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management2 targets
NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment
NIST82-RM-01OT-Specific Risk Management Framework
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment

+22 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 45 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 21 overlapping controls (47% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 9 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security equivalent.

How many controls map between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

Of 45 total FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls, 21 map directly to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls — representing 47% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

24 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.