TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CMMC 2.0vsFedRAMP Moderate

See exactly how CMMC 2.0 controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

216
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
99%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CMMC 2.0 maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 99% coverage across 109 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls identifies 1 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 110 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 216 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Access Control(20 mappings)

AC.L2-3.1.1Authorized Access Control5 targets
→AC-17Remote Access
→AC-2Account Management
→AC-2(3)Disable Accounts
→AC-2(9)Restrictions on Use of Shared and Group Accounts
→AC-3Access Enforcement
AC.L2-3.1.10Session Lock2 targets
→AC-11Device Lock
→AC-11(1)Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays. Conceal, via the device lock, information previously visible on the display with a publicly viewable image
AC.L2-3.1.11Session Termination2 targets
→AC-12Session Termination
→AC-2(5)Inactivity Logout
AC.L2-3.1.12Control Remote Access2 targets
→AC-17Remote Access
→AC-17(1)Monitoring and Control
AC.L2-3.1.13Remote Access Confidentiality
→AC-17(2)Protection of Confidentiality and Integrity Using Encryption
AC.L2-3.1.14Remote Access Routing
→AC-17(3)Managed Access Control Points
AC.L2-3.1.15Privileged Remote Access
→AC-17(4)Privileged Commands and Access
AC.L2-3.1.16Wireless Access Authorization2 targets
→AC-18Wireless Access
→AC-18(3)Wireless Access | Disable Wireless Networking. Disable, when not intended for use, wireless networking capabilities embedded within system components prior to issuance and deployment
AC.L2-3.1.17Wireless Access Protection
→AC-18(1)Authentication and Encryption
AC.L2-3.1.18Mobile Device Connection
→AC-19Access Control for Mobile Devices
AC.L2-3.1.19Encrypt CUI on Mobile
→AC-19(5)Full Device or Container-Based Encryption
AC.L2-3.1.2Transaction & Function Control
→AC-17Remote Access

+196 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other CMMC 2.0 comparisons

CMMC 2.0 vs SOC 2110 mappingsCMMC 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5110 mappingsCMMC 2.0 vs FedRAMP High109 mappingsCMMC 2.0 vs ISO 27001:2022108 mappingsCMMC 2.0 vs ISO 27002:2022107 mappingsCMMC 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3107 mappingsCMMC 2.0 vs PCI DSS 4.0102 mappingsCMMC 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE100 mappings

Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs FedRAMP Moderate6 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs FedRAMP Moderate6 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs FedRAMP Moderate5 mappingsISO 27017 vs FedRAMP Moderate5 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs FedRAMP Moderate5 mappingsISO 27018 vs FedRAMP Moderate5 mappingsAPI 1164 vs FedRAMP Moderate4 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs FedRAMP Moderate4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 686 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CMMC 2.0 and FedRAMP Moderate?

CMMC 2.0 has 110 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 238 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 109 overlapping controls (99% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System and Communications Protection, where 1 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.

How many controls map between CMMC 2.0 and FedRAMP Moderate?

Of 110 total CMMC 2.0 controls, 109 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls — representing 99% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CMMC 2.0 to FedRAMP Moderate?

1 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in System and Communications Protection with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CMMC 2.0 and FedRAMP Moderate?

The domain with the highest gap count is System and Communications Protection (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.