CMMC 2.0vsISO 27002:2022
See exactly how CMMC 2.0 controls map to ISO 27002:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 27002:2022 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CMMC 2.0 maps to ISO 27002:2022 with 97% coverage across 107 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls identifies 3 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in System and Communications Protection.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 110 controls analysed | 692 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 200 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 692 frameworks.
Access Control(20 mappings)
+180 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 692 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The CMMC 2.0 to ISO 27002:2022 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 27002:2022 controls your existing CMMC 2.0 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. CMMC 2.0 into ISO 27002:2022 lands at 50.5%, while ISO 27002:2022 into CMMC 2.0 lands at 67.3%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your CMMC 2.0 evidence buys you for ISO 27002:2022, the other asks the reverse.
47 of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CMMC 2.0. 46 are genuine gaps.
74 of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27002:2022. 36 are genuine gaps.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 97% in the header counts how many CMMC 2.0 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 27002:2022 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other CMMC 2.0 comparisons
Other ISO 27002:2022 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 692 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 692 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CMMC 2.0 and ISO 27002:2022?
CMMC 2.0 has 110 controls across its framework, while ISO 27002:2022 covers 93 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 107 overlapping controls (97% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System and Communications Protection, where 3 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct ISO 27002:2022 equivalent.
How many controls map between CMMC 2.0 and ISO 27002:2022?
Of 110 total CMMC 2.0 controls, 107 map directly to ISO 27002:2022 controls, representing 97% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CMMC 2.0 to ISO 27002:2022?
3 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27002:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in System and Communications Protection with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CMMC 2.0 and ISO 27002:2022?
The domain with the highest gap count is System and Communications Protection (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.