Cross-Framework Mapping

CMMC 2.0vsSOC 2

See exactly how CMMC 2.0 controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

325
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
100%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which SOC 2 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CMMC 2.0 maps to SOC 2 with 100% coverage across 110 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls identifies 0 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in System and Information Integrity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 110 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 325 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

Access Control(20 mappings)

AC.L2-3.1.1Authorized Access Control4 targets
→SOC2-CC6.1CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
→SOC2-CC6.2CC6.2 Registering and authorising users before issuing credentials
→SOC2-CC6.3CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties
→SOC2-P5.1P5.1 Data subject access
AC.L2-3.1.10Session Lock
→SOC2-CC6.1CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
AC.L2-3.1.11Session Termination3 targets
→SOC2-CC6.1CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
→SOC2-CC6.6CC6.6 Protection against threats from outside the system boundary
→SOC2-CC7.1CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
AC.L2-3.1.12Control Remote Access6 targets
→SOC2-CC5.2CC5.2 General controls over technology (COSO principle 11)
→SOC2-CC6.1CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
→SOC2-CC6.2CC6.2 Registering and authorising users before issuing credentials
→SOC2-CC6.3CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties
→SOC2-CC6.6CC6.6 Protection against threats from outside the system boundary
→SOC2-CC6.7CC6.7 Restricting and protecting information in transmission, movement and removal
AC.L2-3.1.13Remote Access Confidentiality5 targets
→SOC2-C1.1C1.1 Identifying and maintaining confidential information
→SOC2-CC5.2CC5.2 General controls over technology (COSO principle 11)
→SOC2-CC6.1CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
→SOC2-CC6.6CC6.6 Protection against threats from outside the system boundary
→SOC2-CC6.7CC6.7 Restricting and protecting information in transmission, movement and removal
AC.L2-3.1.14Remote Access Routing
→SOC2-CC6.1CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets

+305 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The CMMC 2.0 to SOC 2 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which SOC 2 controls your existing CMMC 2.0 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

CMMC 2.0 into SOC 2
36.1%

22 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CMMC 2.0. 39 are genuine gaps.

SOC 2 into CMMC 2.0
34.5%

38 of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 72 are genuine gaps.

CMMC 2.0 to SOC 2
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many CMMC 2.0 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many SOC 2 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CMMC 2.0 and SOC 2?

CMMC 2.0 has 110 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 61 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 110 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System and Information Integrity, where 0 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.

How many controls map between CMMC 2.0 and SOC 2?

Of 110 total CMMC 2.0 controls, 110 map directly to SOC 2 controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CMMC 2.0 to SOC 2?

0 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in System and Information Integrity with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CMMC 2.0 and SOC 2?

The domain with the highest gap count is System and Information Integrity (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.