CMMC 2.0vsSOC 2
See exactly how CMMC 2.0 controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which SOC 2 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CMMC 2.0 maps to SOC 2 with 100% coverage across 110 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls identifies 0 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in System and Information Integrity.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 110 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 325 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Access Control(20 mappings)
+305 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The CMMC 2.0 to SOC 2 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which SOC 2 controls your existing CMMC 2.0 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
22 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CMMC 2.0. 39 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Marking media with markings and distribution limitations identifies confidential information.
Grounded in MP.L2-3.8.4 Media Markings. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Maintains, monitors, and evaluates current processing capacity and use of system components (infrastructure, data, and software) to manage capacity demand and to enable the implementation of additional capacity to help meet its objectives
Every one of the 22 evidenced controls and 39 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
38 of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 72 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Logical access security software and architectures limit system access to authorized users and processes.
Grounded in SOC2-CC6.1 Implements logical access security software, infrastructure and architectures over protected information assets. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Lock the user session after a defined period of inactivity and conceal previously displayed content behind a pattern hiding display until the user reauthenticates.
Every one of the 38 evidenced controls and 72 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many CMMC 2.0 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many SOC 2 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other CMMC 2.0 comparisons
Other SOC 2 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CMMC 2.0 and SOC 2?
CMMC 2.0 has 110 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 61 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 110 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System and Information Integrity, where 0 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.
How many controls map between CMMC 2.0 and SOC 2?
Of 110 total CMMC 2.0 controls, 110 map directly to SOC 2 controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CMMC 2.0 to SOC 2?
0 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in System and Information Integrity with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CMMC 2.0 and SOC 2?
The domain with the highest gap count is System and Information Integrity (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.