Cross-Framework Mapping

CMMC 2.0vsPCI DSS 4.0

See exactly how CMMC 2.0 controls map to PCI DSS 4.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

436
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
93%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which PCI DSS 4.0 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CMMC 2.0 maps to PCI DSS 4.0 with 93% coverage across 102 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls identifies 8 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 110 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 436 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Access Control(20 mappings)

AC.L2-3.1.1Authorized Access Control6 targets
7.2.1An access control model is defined and includes granting access as follows: • Appropriate access depending on the entity's business and access needs. • Access to system components and data resources that is based
7.2.3Required privileges are approved by authorized personnel
8.2.1All users are assigned a unique ID before access to system components or cardholder data is allowed
pci-dss-4-0::7.2.4All user accounts and related access privileges, including third-party/vendor accounts, are reviewed as follows: • At least once every six months. • To ensure user accounts and access remain appropriate based on job function.
pci-dss-4-0::7.2.5All application and system accounts and related access privileges are assigned and managed as follows: • Based on the least privileges necessary for the operability of the system or application. • Access is limited
pci-dss-4-0::7.3.1An access control system(s) is in place that restricts access based on a user's need to know and covers all system components
AC.L2-3.1.10Session Lock
8.2.8Session idle timeout
AC.L2-3.1.11Session Termination
8.2.8Session idle timeout
AC.L2-3.1.12Control Remote Access2 targets
8.2.7Third-party access managed
8.4.3MFA is implemented for all remote access originating from outside the entity's network that could access or impact the CDE
AC.L2-3.1.13Remote Access Confidentiality3 targets
2.2.7Non-console administrative access encrypted
4.2.1Strong cryptography and security protocols are implemented as follows to safeguard PAN during transmission over open, public networks: • Only trusted keys and certificates are accepted. • Certificates used to safeguard PAN during transmission
8.4.3MFA is implemented for all remote access originating from outside the entity's network that could access or impact the CDE
AC.L2-3.1.14Remote Access Routing
1.4.2Inbound traffic from untrusted networks restricted
AC.L2-3.1.15Privileged Remote Access5 targets
2.2.7Non-console administrative access encrypted
8.2.1All users are assigned a unique ID before access to system components or cardholder data is allowed
8.3.1All user access to system components for users and administrators is authenticated via at least one of the following authentication factors: • Something you know, such as a password or passphrase. • Something you
8.4.1MFA is implemented for all non-console access into the CDE for personnel with administrative access
8.4.3MFA is implemented for all remote access originating from outside the entity's network that could access or impact the CDE
AC.L2-3.1.16Wireless Access Authorization
1.3.3NSCs between wireless and CDE

+416 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The CMMC 2.0 to PCI DSS 4.0 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which PCI DSS 4.0 controls your existing CMMC 2.0 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. CMMC 2.0 into PCI DSS 4.0 lands at 37.3%, while PCI DSS 4.0 into CMMC 2.0 lands at 61.8%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your CMMC 2.0 evidence buys you for PCI DSS 4.0, the other asks the reverse.

CMMC 2.0 into PCI DSS 4.0
37.3%

93 of 249 PCI DSS 4.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CMMC 2.0. 156 are genuine gaps.

55.6%Req 10: Logging and Monitoring
51.7%Req 8: Identify and Authenticate Users
46.2%Req 9: Restrict Physical Access
52.6%Req 1: Network Security Controls
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 314 candidate mappings were examined and 153 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 1.2.1 NSC configuration standards defined

Establishing and enforcing security configuration settings is the configuration standard for network controls.

Grounded in CM.L2-3.4.2 Security Configuration Enforcement. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 1.1.1 NSC policies and procedures documented

All security policies and operational procedures for Requirement 1 are documented, kept current, in use, and known to affected parties.

Every one of the 93 evidenced controls and 156 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

PCI DSS 4.0 into CMMC 2.0
61.8%

68 of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for PCI DSS 4.0. 42 are genuine gaps.

45.5%Access Control
62.5%System and Communications Protection
81.8%Identification and Authentication
77.8%Configuration Management
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 240 candidate mappings were examined and 115 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: AC.L2-3.1.1 Authorized Access Control

PCI assigns a unique ID to every user before any system access is allowed

Grounded in 8.2.1 All users are assigned a unique ID before access to system components or cardholder data is allowed. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: AC.L2-3.1.11 Session Termination

Automatically end a user session once a defined condition, such as an inactivity period or maximum session duration, is met.

Every one of the 68 evidenced controls and 42 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

CMMC 2.0 to PCI DSS 4.0
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 93% in the header counts how many CMMC 2.0 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many PCI DSS 4.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CMMC 2.0 and PCI DSS 4.0?

CMMC 2.0 has 110 controls across its framework, while PCI DSS 4.0 covers 249 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 102 overlapping controls (93% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System and Communications Protection, where 3 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct PCI DSS 4.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between CMMC 2.0 and PCI DSS 4.0?

Of 110 total CMMC 2.0 controls, 102 map directly to PCI DSS 4.0 controls, representing 93% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CMMC 2.0 to PCI DSS 4.0?

8 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in PCI DSS 4.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in System and Communications Protection with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CMMC 2.0 and PCI DSS 4.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is System and Communications Protection (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.