Cross-Framework Mapping

CMMC 2.0vsPCI DSS 4.0

See exactly how CMMC 2.0 controls map to PCI DSS 4.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

436
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
93%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which PCI DSS 4.0 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CMMC 2.0 maps to PCI DSS 4.0 with 93% coverage across 102 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls identifies 8 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 110 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 436 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

Access Control(20 mappings)

AC.L2-3.1.1Authorized Access Control6 targets
→7.2.17.2.1 Access control model defined
→7.2.37.2.3 Privileges approved by authorized personnel
→8.2.18.2.1 Unique ID assigned to every user
→pci-dss-4-0::7.2.47.2.4 User accounts and privileges reviewed every six months
→pci-dss-4-0::7.2.57.2.5 Application and system accounts least privilege
→pci-dss-4-0::7.3.17.3.1 Need-to-know access control system covers all components
AC.L2-3.1.10Session Lock
→8.2.88.2.8 Re-authentication after 15 minutes idle
AC.L2-3.1.11Session Termination
→8.2.88.2.8 Re-authentication after 15 minutes idle
AC.L2-3.1.12Control Remote Access2 targets
→8.2.78.2.7 Third-party remote access accounts controlled
→8.4.38.4.3 MFA for remote access that could reach CDE
AC.L2-3.1.13Remote Access Confidentiality3 targets
→2.2.72.2.7 Non-console administrative access encrypted
→4.2.14.2.1 Strong cryptography safeguards PAN over public networks
→8.4.38.4.3 MFA for remote access that could reach CDE
AC.L2-3.1.14Remote Access Routing
→1.4.21.4.2 Restricting traffic entering trusted networks from outside
AC.L2-3.1.15Privileged Remote Access5 targets
→2.2.72.2.7 Non-console administrative access encrypted
→8.2.18.2.1 Unique ID assigned to every user
→8.3.18.3.1 Access authenticated with at least one factor
→8.4.18.4.1 MFA for non-console administrative CDE access
→8.4.38.4.3 MFA for remote access that could reach CDE
AC.L2-3.1.16Wireless Access Authorization
→1.3.31.3.3 NSCs between wireless networks and the CDE

+416 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The CMMC 2.0 to PCI DSS 4.0 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which PCI DSS 4.0 controls your existing CMMC 2.0 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. CMMC 2.0 into PCI DSS 4.0 lands at 33.2%, while PCI DSS 4.0 into CMMC 2.0 lands at 61.8%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your CMMC 2.0 evidence buys you for PCI DSS 4.0, the other asks the reverse.

CMMC 2.0 into PCI DSS 4.0
33.2%

93 of 280 PCI DSS 4.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CMMC 2.0. 187 are genuine gaps.

PCI DSS 4.0 into CMMC 2.0
61.8%

68 of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for PCI DSS 4.0. 42 are genuine gaps.

CMMC 2.0 to PCI DSS 4.0
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 93% in the header counts how many CMMC 2.0 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many PCI DSS 4.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CMMC 2.0 and PCI DSS 4.0?

CMMC 2.0 has 110 controls across its framework, while PCI DSS 4.0 covers 280 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 102 overlapping controls (93% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System and Communications Protection, where 3 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct PCI DSS 4.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between CMMC 2.0 and PCI DSS 4.0?

Of 110 total CMMC 2.0 controls, 102 map directly to PCI DSS 4.0 controls, representing 93% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CMMC 2.0 to PCI DSS 4.0?

8 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in PCI DSS 4.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in System and Communications Protection with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CMMC 2.0 and PCI DSS 4.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is System and Communications Protection (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.