Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsFedRAMP Moderate

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

651
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
97%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which FedRAMP Moderate controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 97% coverage across 90 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 93 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 10 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Clause 9 – ISO 27001:2022.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 93 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 651 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Organizational controls – ISO 27001:2022(20 mappings)

iso-27001-2022::5.1Policies for information security15 targets
AC-1Policy and Procedures
AT-1Policy and Procedures
AU-1Policy and Procedures
CA-1Policy and Procedures
CM-1Policy and Procedures
CM-11User-Installed Software
MA-1Policy and Procedures
PL-1Policy and Procedures
PL-2System Security and Privacy Plans
PL-8Security and Privacy Architectures
PS-1Policy and Procedures
RA-1Policy and Procedures
SC-1Policy and Procedures
SI-1Policy and Procedures
SR-1Policy and Procedures (SR-1)
iso-27001-2022::5.10Acceptable use of information and other associated assets5 targets
AC-8System Use Notification
CM-10Software Usage Restrictions
MP-7Media Use
PL-4Rules of Behavior
PL-4(1)Rules of Behavior | Social Media and External Site/application Usage Restrictions. Include in the rules of behavior, restrictions on: (a) Use of social media, social networking sites, and external sites/applications; (b) Posting organizational information

+631 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The ISO 27001:2022 to FedRAMP Moderate crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP Moderate controls your existing ISO 27001:2022 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. ISO 27001:2022 into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 49.8%, while FedRAMP Moderate into ISO 27001:2022 lands at 80.6%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your ISO 27001:2022 evidence buys you for FedRAMP Moderate, the other asks the reverse.

ISO 27001:2022 into FedRAMP Moderate
49.8%

161 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27001:2022. 162 are genuine gaps.

41.9%AC - Access Control
84.2%PE - Physical and Environmental Protection
44.4%CM - Configuration Management
50%SI - System and Information Integrity
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 597 candidate mappings were examined and 413 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: AC-1 Policy and Procedures

Policies for information security include the access control policy.

Grounded in iso-27001-2022::5.1 Policies for information security. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: AC-11(1) Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays. Conceal, via the device lock, information...

Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays. Conceal, via the device lock, information previously visible on the display with a publicly viewable image

Every one of the 161 evidenced controls and 162 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

FedRAMP Moderate into ISO 27001:2022
80.6%

75 of 93 ISO 27001:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 18 are genuine gaps.

81.1%Organizational controls
79.4%Technological controls
78.6%Physical controls
87.5%People controls
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 209 candidate mappings were examined and 35 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 5.1 Policies for information security

Planning policy and procedures are documented, disseminated, reviewed and updated on schedule.

Grounded in PL-1 Policy and Procedures. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 5.13 Labelling of information

Label information consistently with the classification scheme so handling rules can follow it.

Every one of the 75 evidenced controls and 18 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

ISO 27001:2022 to FedRAMP Moderate
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 97% in the header counts how many ISO 27001:2022 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP Moderate controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and FedRAMP Moderate?

ISO 27001:2022 has 93 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 323 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 90 overlapping controls (97% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 9 – ISO 27001:2022, where 5 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and FedRAMP Moderate?

Of 93 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 90 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls, representing 97% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to FedRAMP Moderate?

10 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 9 – ISO 27001:2022 with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and FedRAMP Moderate?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 9 – ISO 27001:2022 (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.