Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27002:2022vsFedRAMP Moderate

See exactly how ISO 27002:2022 controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

676
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
97%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which FedRAMP Moderate controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27002:2022 maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 97% coverage across 90 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls identifies 14 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Clause 0 – ISO 27002:2022.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 93 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 676 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022(20 mappings)

iso-27002-2022::5.1Policies for information security17 targets
AC-1Policy and Procedures
AU-1Policy and Procedures
CA-1Policy and Procedures
CM-1Policy and Procedures
CP-1Policy and Procedures
IA-1Policy and Procedures
MA-1Policy and Procedures
MP-1Policy and Procedures
PE-1Policy and Procedures
PL-1Policy and Procedures
PL-2System Security and Privacy Plans
PL-8Security and Privacy Architectures
PS-1Policy and Procedures
RA-1Policy and Procedures
SC-1Policy and Procedures
SI-1Policy and Procedures
SR-1Policy and Procedures (SR-1)
iso-27002-2022::5.10Acceptable use of information and other associated assets3 targets
AC-22Publicly Accessible Content
AC-8System Use Notification
CM-10Software Usage Restrictions

+656 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The ISO 27002:2022 to FedRAMP Moderate crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP Moderate controls your existing ISO 27002:2022 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. ISO 27002:2022 into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 56.3%, while FedRAMP Moderate into ISO 27002:2022 lands at 80.6%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your ISO 27002:2022 evidence buys you for FedRAMP Moderate, the other asks the reverse.

ISO 27002:2022 into FedRAMP Moderate
56.3%

182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27002:2022. 141 are genuine gaps.

60.5%AC - Access Control
74.1%CM - Configuration Management
84.2%PE - Physical and Environmental Protection
66.7%SA - System and Services Acquisition
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 684 candidate mappings were examined and 348 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: AC-1 Policy and Procedures

Requires an access control policy based on business and security requirements.

Grounded in iso-27002-2022::5.15 Access control. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: AC-12 Session Termination

Automatically terminate user session after FedRAMP-defined conditions (idle timeout, trigger events).

Every one of the 182 evidenced controls and 141 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

FedRAMP Moderate into ISO 27002:2022
80.6%

75 of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 18 are genuine gaps.

81.1%Organizational controls
79.4%Technological controls
78.6%Physical controls
87.5%People controls
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 205 candidate mappings were examined and 31 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 5.1 Policies for information security

Planning policy and procedures are documented, disseminated, reviewed and updated on schedule.

Grounded in PL-1 Policy and Procedures. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 5.13 Labelling of information

Requires a matching set of information labelling procedures to be developed and implemented, so that information carries markings consistent with the classification scheme the organisation has adopted.

Every one of the 75 evidenced controls and 18 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

ISO 27002:2022 to FedRAMP Moderate
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 97% in the header counts how many ISO 27002:2022 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP Moderate controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27002:2022 and FedRAMP Moderate?

ISO 27002:2022 has 93 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 323 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 90 overlapping controls (97% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 0 – ISO 27002:2022, where 6 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27002:2022 and FedRAMP Moderate?

Of 93 total ISO 27002:2022 controls, 90 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls, representing 97% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27002:2022 to FedRAMP Moderate?

14 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 0 – ISO 27002:2022 with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27002:2022 and FedRAMP Moderate?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 0 – ISO 27002:2022 (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.