TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1vsFedRAMP Moderate

See exactly how Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

467
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
94%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which FedRAMP Moderate controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 94% coverage across 186 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls identifies 11 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 197 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 467 mapped controls across 17 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

A&A - Audit & Assurance(13 mappings)

CCM-A&A-01Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures
→CA-1Policy and Procedures
CCM-A&A-02Independent Assessments4 targets
→CA-2Control Assessments
→CA-2(1)Independent Assessors
→CA-2(3)Control Assessments | Leveraging Results from External Organizations. Leverage the results of control assessments performed by [Assignment: organization-defined external organization] on [Assignment: organization-defined system] when the assessment meets [Assignment: organization-defined requirements]
→CA-7(1)Independent Assessment
CCM-A&A-03Risk Based Planning Assessment3 targets
→CA-2Control Assessments
→CA-7Continuous Monitoring
→RA-3Risk Assessment
CCM-A&A-04Requirements Compliance2 targets
→CA-2Control Assessments
→PL-2System Security and Privacy Plans
CCM-A&A-05Audit Management Process2 targets
→CA-2Control Assessments
→CA-7Continuous Monitoring
CCM-A&A-06Remediation
→CA-5Plan of Action and Milestones

AIS - Application & Interface Security(7 mappings)

CCM-AIS-01Application and Interface Security Policy and Procedures3 targets
→SA-15Development Process, Standards, and Tools. a. Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to follow a documented development process that: 1. Explicitly addresses security and privacy requirements; 2. Identifies the
→SA-3System Development Life Cycle
→SA-8Security and Privacy Engineering Principles
CCM-AIS-02Application Security Baseline Requirements2 targets
→CM-6Configuration Settings
→SA-4Acquisition Process
CCM-AIS-03Application Security Metrics
→SA-11Developer Testing and Evaluation
CCM-AIS-04Secure Application Design and Development
→PL-8Security and Privacy Architectures

+447 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to FedRAMP Moderate crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP Moderate controls your existing Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 34.1%, while FedRAMP Moderate into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 lands at 60.4%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 evidence buys you for FedRAMP Moderate, the other asks the reverse.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into FedRAMP Moderate
34.1%

110 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 213 are genuine gaps.

32.6%AC - Access Control
44.4%CM - Configuration Management
57.9%PE - Physical and Environmental Protection
62.5%AU - Audit and Accountability
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 349 candidate mappings were examined and 3 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair. This pair was additionally re-checked after CSA CCM v4.0.1 was rebuilt from the CAIQ v4.0.1 source on 2026-08-19: its mappings were originally judged when CCM carried no requirement text, a sample of 70 across the 21 CCM pairs found about 80 percent holding cleanly, and the two identified errors were corrected before release.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: AC-1 Policy and Procedures

Identity and access management policy and procedures are the same policy artefact.

Grounded in CCM-IAM-01 Identity and Access Management Policy and Procedures. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: AC-11(1) Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays. Conceal, via the device lock, information...

Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays. Conceal, via the device lock, information previously visible on the display with a publicly viewable image

Every one of the 110 evidenced controls and 213 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

FedRAMP Moderate into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
60.4%

119 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 78 are genuine gaps.

87.5%IAM - Identity & Access Management
80%DCS - Datacenter Security
84.6%HRS - Human Resources Security
84.6%LOG - Logging & Monitoring
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 292 candidate mappings were examined and 1 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair. This pair was additionally re-checked after CSA CCM v4.0.1 was rebuilt from the CAIQ v4.0.1 source on 2026-08-19: its mappings were originally judged when CCM carried no requirement text, a sample of 70 across the 21 CCM pairs found about 80 percent holding cleanly, and the two identified errors were corrected before release.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: CCM-A&A-01 Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures

Assessment policy and procedures are documented, approved and reviewed on a defined cycle.

Grounded in CA-1 Policy and Procedures. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: CCM-A&A-04 Requirements Compliance

Confirm during each audit that the organisation meets every standard, regulation, contract clause and statutory obligation inside the audit scope, and record the outcome for each one.

Every one of the 119 evidenced controls and 78 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to FedRAMP Moderate
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 94% in the header counts how many Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP Moderate controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 comparisons

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5193 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs FedRAMP High186 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH184 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE183 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs C5 (Germany)182 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs ISO 27002:2022180 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs ISO 27001:2022180 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0177 mappings

Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs FedRAMP Moderate6 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs FedRAMP Moderate6 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs FedRAMP Moderate5 mappingsISO 27017 vs FedRAMP Moderate5 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs FedRAMP Moderate5 mappingsISO 27018 vs FedRAMP Moderate5 mappingsAPI 1164 vs FedRAMP Moderate4 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs FedRAMP Moderate4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 686 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and FedRAMP Moderate?

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 has 197 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 238 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 186 overlapping controls (94% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 4 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.

How many controls map between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and FedRAMP Moderate?

Of 197 total Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls, 186 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls, representing 94% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to FedRAMP Moderate?

11 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and FedRAMP Moderate?

The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.