Cross-Framework Mapping

CMMC 2.0vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how CMMC 2.0 controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
103
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CMMC 2.0 maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 6% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls identifies 103 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Access Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 110 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 418K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 418K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

Access Control(1 mappings)

AC.L2-3.1.1Authorized Access Control
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed

Awareness and Training(1 mappings)

AT.L2-3.2.1Role-Based Risk Awareness
NIST-CSF-PR.AT-01Personnel are provided awareness and training to perform cybersecurity duties

Audit and Accountability(1 mappings)

AU.L2-3.3.1System Auditing
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events

Identification and Authentication(1 mappings)

IA.L2-3.5.1Identification
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed

Incident Response(1 mappings)

IR.L2-3.6.1Incident Handling
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties

Physical Protection(1 mappings)

PE.L2-3.10.1Limit Physical Access
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced

System and Communications Protection(1 mappings)

SC.L2-3.13.1Boundary Protection
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized access

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 715 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (418K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CMMC 2.0 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

CMMC 2.0 has 110 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Access Control, where 21 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between CMMC 2.0 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 110 total CMMC 2.0 controls, 7 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 103 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CMMC 2.0 to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

103 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Access Control with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CMMC 2.0 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Access Control (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.