CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)vsFedRAMP Moderate
See exactly how CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which FedRAMP Moderate controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 100% coverage across 39 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls identifies 0 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CFTC System Safeguards: Registrant Specific Requirements.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 133 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
CFTC System Safeguards: Risk Analysis and Oversight Program(20 mappings)
+113 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to FedRAMP Moderate crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP Moderate controls your existing CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 9.9%, while FedRAMP Moderate into CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) lands at 69.2%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) evidence buys you for FedRAMP Moderate, the other asks the reverse.
32 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). 291 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Expressly requires access to systems and data on a least privilege basis.
Grounded in CFTC-SS-3 Information Security Category. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Develop and disseminate access control policy and procedures; review at least annually (FedRAMP parameter); update following defined events.
Every one of the 32 evidenced controls and 291 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
27 of 39 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 12 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Plan of action and milestones drives remediation of identified deficiencies.
Grounded in CA-5 Plan of Action and Milestones. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
In addressing the prescribed categories, follow generally accepted standards and best practices with respect to the development, operation, reliability, security and capacity of automated systems.
Every one of the 27 evidenced controls and 12 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP Moderate controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons
Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and FedRAMP Moderate?
CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) has 39 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 323 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 39 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CFTC System Safeguards: Registrant Specific Requirements, where 0 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.
How many controls map between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and FedRAMP Moderate?
Of 39 total CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls, 39 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to FedRAMP Moderate?
0 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in CFTC System Safeguards: Registrant Specific Requirements with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and FedRAMP Moderate?
The domain with the highest gap count is CFTC System Safeguards: Registrant Specific Requirements (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.