CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
See exactly how CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 43% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CFTC System Safeguards: Risk Analysis and Oversight Program.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
CFTC System Safeguards: Risk Analysis and Oversight Program(3 mappings)
CFTC System Safeguards: Cybersecurity Testing(4 mappings)
CFTC System Safeguards: Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons
Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) has 21 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CFTC System Safeguards: Risk Analysis and Oversight Program, where 5 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
Of 21 total CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls, 9 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
12 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in CFTC System Safeguards: Risk Analysis and Oversight Program with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is CFTC System Safeguards: Risk Analysis and Oversight Program (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.