Cross-Framework Mapping

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)vsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1

See exactly how CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls map to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

126
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
92%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) maps to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 with 92% coverage across 36 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls identifies 3 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CFTC System Safeguards: Registrant Specific Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 126 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

CFTC System Safeguards: Risk Analysis and Oversight Program(20 mappings)

CFTC-SS-1Program of Risk Analysis and Oversight3 targets
CCM-GRC-01Governance Program Policy and Procedures
CCM-GRC-02Risk Management Program
CCM-GRC-05Information Security Program
CFTC-SS-12Capacity and Performance Planning Category2 targets
CCM-CCC-02Quality Testing
CCM-IVS-02Capacity and Resource Planning
CFTC-SS-2Enterprise Risk Management and Governance Category6 targets
CCM-A&A-05Audit Management Process
CCM-A&A-06Remediation
CCM-GRC-01Governance Program Policy and Procedures
CCM-GRC-02Risk Management Program
CCM-GRC-06Governance Responsibility Model
CCM-HRS-09Personnel Roles and Responsibilities
CFTC-SS-22Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning Category3 targets
CCM-BCR-03Business Continuity Strategy
CCM-BCR-04Business Continuity Planning
CCM-BCR-06Business Continuity Exercises
CFTC-SS-23Resources Sufficient to Fulfil Obligations2 targets
CCM-BCR-03Business Continuity Strategy
CCM-IVS-02Capacity and Resource Planning
CFTC-SS-3Information Security Category4 targets
CCM-DCS-01Off-Site Equipment Disposal Policy and Procedures
CCM-DCS-04Secure Media Transportation Policy and Procedures
CCM-DSP-02Secure Disposal
CCM-GRC-05Information Security Program

+106 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls your existing CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 lands at 19.3%, while Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) lands at 61.5%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) evidence buys you for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1, the other asks the reverse.

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
19.3%

38 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). 159 are genuine gaps.

63.6%BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience
83.3%A&A - Audit & Assurance
50%TVM - Threat & Vulnerability Management
26.7%DCS - Datacenter Security
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 80 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: CCM-A&A-01 Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures

Requires regular periodic objective testing and review of automated systems and controls.

Grounded in CFTC-SS-33 Regular Periodic Objective Testing and Review of Automated Systems. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: CCM-A&A-04 Requirements Compliance

Confirm during each audit that the organisation meets every standard, regulation, contract clause and statutory obligation inside the audit scope, and record the outcome for each one.

Every one of the 38 evidenced controls and 159 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)
61.5%

24 of 39 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 15 are genuine gaps.

80%CFTC System Safeguards: Risk Analysis and Oversight Program
80%CFTC System Safeguards: Cybersecurity Testing
50%CFTC System Safeguards: Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
25%CFTC System Safeguards: Notification, Records and Remediation
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 85 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 37.1401(a)(1), 38.1051(a)(1), 49.24(b)(1) Enterprise Risk Management and Governance Category

Governance policies with visible leadership sponsorship deliver board and management oversight.

Grounded in CCM-GRC-01 Governance Program Policy and Procedures. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 37.1401(b), 38.1051(b), 39.18(b)(3), 49.24(c) Generally Accepted Standards and Best Practices

In addressing the prescribed categories, follow generally accepted standards and best practices with respect to the development, operation, reliability, security and capacity of automated systems.

Every one of the 24 evidenced controls and 15 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 92% in the header counts how many CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons

Other Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) has 39 controls across its framework, while Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 covers 197 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 36 overlapping controls (92% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CFTC System Safeguards: Registrant Specific Requirements, where 2 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 equivalent.

How many controls map between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?

Of 39 total CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls, 36 map directly to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls, representing 92% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?

3 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct equivalent in Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. The highest concentration of gaps is in CFTC System Safeguards: Registrant Specific Requirements with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?

The domain with the highest gap count is CFTC System Safeguards: Registrant Specific Requirements (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.