TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

60
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
45%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 45% coverage across 22 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 60 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Information Security(20 mappings)

38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs3 targets
→NIST800-RA-1Policy and procedures for risk assessment
→NIST800-RA-2Security categorization
→NIST800-RA-5Vulnerability monitoring and scanning
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs3 targets
→NIST800-RA-1Policy and procedures for risk assessment
→NIST800-RA-2Security categorization
→NIST800-RA-5Vulnerability monitoring and scanning
DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification
→NIST800-RA-2Security categorization
DSPF-INFO-3Information Access Controls6 targets
→NIST800-AC-2Account management
→NIST800-AC-20Use of external systems
→NIST800-AC-7Unsuccessful logon attempts
→NIST800-PS-1Policy and procedures for personnel security
→NIST800-PS-3Personnel screening
→NIST800-PS-8Personnel sanctions
EIOPA-GL-11Security Monitoring
→NIST800-CA-7Continuous monitoring
EIOPA-GL-8Logical Security3 targets
→NIST800-AC-2Account management
→NIST800-AC-20Use of external systems
→NIST800-AC-7Unsuccessful logon attempts
EIOPA-GL-9Physical Security3 targets
→NIST800-PE-14Environmental controls
→NIST800-PE-2Physical access authorizations
→NIST800-PE-3Physical access control

+40 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)25 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange24 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)24 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202424 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs CSA CCM v423 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 536 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 534 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 534 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) has 49 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 172 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 22 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 19 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 49 total CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls, 22 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

27 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.