ISO 22301:2019
Improvement, ISO 22301:2019

ISO 22301:2019 10.2: Continual improvement

Keep making the BCMS more suitable, adequate and effective, using both qualitative and quantitative measures, and use what analysis and evaluation show, together with what management review produces, to decide whether business or BCMS needs or opportunities have to be dealt with as part of improvement.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 83 controls across 39 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

PCI DSS 4.0 · 7 controls

  • 10.4.3 10.4.3 Exceptions and anomalies from log review addressed
  • 10.7.1 10.7.1 Service providers detect critical control failures (superseded)
  • 10.7.3 10.7.3 Respond promptly to critical security control failures
  • 11.4.4 11.4.4 Correct exploitable findings from penetration tests
  • 12.10.6 12.10.6 Plan evolved from lessons learned and industry developments
  • 12.10.7 12.10.7 Response procedures for PAN found in unexpected locations
  • 12.4.2.1 12.4.2.1 Documentation of quarterly operational reviews

ISO 27001:2022 · 5 controls

  • 5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
  • 5.26 Response to information security incidents
  • 5.27 Learning from information security incidents
  • 5.35 Independent review of information security
  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

ISO 27002:2022 · 5 controls

  • 5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
  • 5.26 Response to information security incidents
  • 5.27 Learning from information security incidents
  • 5.35 Independent review of information security
  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security
  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-02 Improvements are identified from security tests and exercises, including those done in coordination with suppliers and relevant third parties
  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-03 Improvements are identified from execution of operational processes, procedures, and activities
  • NIST-CSF-RS.AN-03 Analysis is performed to establish what has taken place during an incident and the root cause of the incident
  • NIST-CSF-RS.AN-08 An incident's magnitude is estimated and validated
  • NIST-CSF-RS.MA-02 Incident reports are triaged and validated

SOC 2 · 5 controls

  • SOC2-CC4.2 CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)
  • SOC2-CC7.4 CC7.4 Responding to security incidents
  • SOC2-CC7.5 CC7.5 Recovering from security incidents
  • SOC2-P6.3 P6.3 Record of unauthorised disclosures and breaches
  • SOC2-P8.1 P8.1 Inquiries, complaints, disputes and compliance monitoring

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

  • CIS-16.3 Perform Root Cause Analysis on Security Vulnerabilities
  • CIS-17.8 Conduct Post-Incident Reviews
  • CIS-18.3 Remediate Penetration Test Findings
  • CIS-7.2 Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

  • ISO-50001-10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • 10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • 10.2 Continual improvement
  • CPS230-66 Review of Operational Risk Management
  • CPS230-P31 Remediation of Material Operational Risk Weaknesses

CMMC 2.0 · 2 controls

HIPAA Security Rule · 2 controls

ISO 22000:2018 · 2 controls

  • 10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • 10.2 Continual improvement
  • ISO-22313-10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • ISO22313-10.1 Guidance on nonconformity and corrective action

ISO 30401 · 2 controls

  • ISO30401-10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • ISO30401-15 Nonconformity and corrective action

ISO 37001:2016 · 2 controls

  • 10.1 10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • 10.2 10.2 Continual improvement
  • ISO-37002-10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • ISO37002-10.2 Nonconformity and Corrective Action
  • ISO-39001-10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • ISO39001-10.1 Nonconformity and Corrective Action
  • ISO-41001-10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • ISO41001-10.1 Nonconformity and Corrective Action

ISO 55001:2014 · 2 controls

  • 10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • 10.2 Preventive action

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 · 2 controls

  • 27003-10.1 Nonconformity and Corrective Action
  • ISO27003-10.2 Continual improvement

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 2 controls

  • 10.1 Continual improvement
  • 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 2 controls

  • AS9100D-10.2 Nonconformity and Corrective Action
  • SPC1-4.5.4 Nonconformity, Corrective and Preventive Action

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-COM-04 Information on information security performance and management assessment of the ISMS
  • CFTC-SS-36 Internal Reporting and Review by Senior Management and the Board
  • STAR-NONCONF-01 Nonconformity and corrective action management

FedRAMP High · 1 control

  • CA-5 Plan of Action and Milestones

FedRAMP Moderate · 1 control

  • CA-5 Plan of Action and Milestones

ISO 14001:2015 · 1 control

  • 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

  • 5.8.1 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • ISO28001-4.15 Nonconformity, corrective and preventive action

ISO 28002:2011 · 1 control

  • A.7.5 A.7.5 Continual improvement

ISO 37301:2021 · 1 control

  • 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action

ISO 45001:2018 · 1 control

  • 10.2 Incident, nonconformity and corrective action

ISO 56002 · 1 control

  • ISO-56002-10.2 Deviation, nonconformity and corrective action

ISO 9001:2015 · 1 control

  • 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Improvement, ISO 22301:2019

You are reading one control. How much of ISO 22301:2019 have you already done?

ISO 22301:2019 10.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 22301:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and 28 of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 83 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.