C5 (Germany) C5-COM-04: Information on information security performance and management assessment of the ISMS

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 40 controls across 26 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

APRA CPS 234 · 3 controls

CPS234-13 Board Responsibility for Information Security
CPS234-28 Escalation of Unremediated Testing Deficiencies
CPS234-P17 Active Maintenance of Capability Against Change

ISO 22301:2019 · 3 controls

10.2 Continual improvement
9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
9.3.1 General

SOC 2 · 3 controls

SOC2-CC1.2 CC1.2 Board independence and oversight of internal control (COSO principle 2)
SOC2-CC2.1 CC2.1 Relevant, quality information to support internal control (COSO principle 13)
SOC2-CC4.2 CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management · 2 controls

CPS230-47 Monitoring and Senior Management Reporting on Material Arrangements
CPS230-P31 Remediation of Material Operational Risk Weaknesses

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) · 2 controls

AUCDR-IS-STEP1 Step 1 - Define and implement security governance for CDR data
AUCDR-IS-STEP4 Step 4 - Implement a formal controls assessment program

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 2 controls

CFTC-SS-2 Enterprise Risk Management and Governance Category
CFTC-SS-36 Internal Reporting and Review by Senior Management and the Board

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-A&A-06 Remediation
CCM-GRC-01 Governance Program Policy and Procedures

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

CA-6 Authorization
CA-7 Continuous Monitoring

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

CA-6 Authorization
CA-7 Continuous Monitoring

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 2 controls

NIST-CSF-GV.OV-01 Cybersecurity risk management strategy outcomes are reviewed to inform and adjust strategy and direction
NIST-CSF-GV.OV-03 Organizational cybersecurity risk management performance is evaluated and reviewed for adjustments needed

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

NIST800-CA-7 CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
NIST800-PM-6 PM-6 Measures of Performance

APRA CPS 220 Risk Management · 1 control

CPS220-11 Annual Audit Review of the Framework

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC11-BP08 Build a program that embeds security ownership in workload teams

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-GS-5 Define and implement security posture management strategy

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

CA.L2-3.12.3 Security Control Monitoring

DORA · 1 control

DORA-Art.5 Governance and organisation

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D) Information System Activity Review (Required)

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

5.35 Independent review of information security

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

Art.20.1 Management body approves the cybersecurity risk-management measures and oversees their implementation

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-PM-6 Measures of Performance

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.12.03 Continuous Monitoring

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.11.5e Assess Effectiveness of Security Solutions

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D) Information System Activity Review (Required)

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

12.4.2.1 12.4.2.1 Documentation of quarterly operational reviews

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of C5 (Germany) have you already done?

C5 (Germany) C5-COM-04 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of C5 (Germany) your existing evidence covers. Hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and 95 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls already carry evidence.

If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.178.5% covered · 26 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 572.7% covered · 33 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate71.1% covered · 35 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202267.8% covered · 39 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202257% covered · 52 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 350.4% covered · 60 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free