CIS Controls v8 CIS-16.3: Perform Root Cause Analysis on Security Vulnerabilities

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 26 controls across 18 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-218 · 4 controls

SP800-218-RV.3.1 Analyze Vulnerabilities to Identify Root Causes
SP800-218-RV.3.2 Identify and Fix Similar Vulnerabilities
SP800-218-RV.3.3 Review SDLC to Prevent Recurrence
SP800-218-RV.3.4 Document Lessons Learned

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

NIST800-CA-7 CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
NIST800-IR-4 IR-4 Incident Handling
NIST800-RA-5 RA-5 Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning
NIST800-SI-2 SI-2 Flaw Remediation

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 3 controls

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-02 Improvements are identified from security tests and exercises, including those done in coordination with suppliers and relevant third parties
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-03 Improvements are identified from execution of operational processes, procedures, and activities
NIST-CSF-RS.AN-08 An incident's magnitude is estimated and validated

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC10-BP08 Establish a framework for learning from incidents

Australian Information Security Manual · 1 control

ISM-1909 Root cause analysis of vulnerabilities

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-IR-7 Post-incident activity - conduct lesson learned and retain evidence

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-OPS-20 Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Measurements, Analyses and Assessments of Procedures

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-AIS-07 Application Vulnerability Remediation

FedRAMP High · 1 control

SI-2 Flaw Remediation

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

5.27 Learning from information security incidents

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

5.27 Learning from information security incidents

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

5.8.1 Nonconformity and corrective action

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-SI-2 Flaw Remediation

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

6.3.1 6.3.1 Vulnerability identification and risk ranking

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC7.5 CC7.5 Recovering from security incidents

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of CIS Controls v8 have you already done?

CIS Controls v8 CIS-16.3 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of CIS Controls v8 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 102 of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27001:202266.7% covered · 51 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate62.7% covered · 57 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 557.5% covered · 65 gaps If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.050.3% covered · 76 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202249.7% covered · 77 gaps If you hold Azure Security Benchmark49% covered · 78 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 240 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free