CMMC 2.0
Security Assessment

CMMC 2.0 CA.L2-3.12.2: Plan of Action

Develop and carry out plans of action that correct identified deficiencies and reduce or eliminate vulnerabilities.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 47 controls across 28 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 5 controls

  • SOC2-CC3.2 CC3.2 Identifying and analysing risks to objectives (COSO principle 7)
  • SOC2-CC4.2 CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)
  • SOC2-CC5.1 CC5.1 Selecting control activities that mitigate risk (COSO principle 10)
  • SOC2-CC8.1 CC8.1 Managing changes to procedures, software, data and infrastructure
  • SOC2-CC9.1 CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption

ISO 22301:2019 · 4 controls

  • 10.2 Continual improvement
  • 6.1.2 Addressing risks and opportunities
  • 8.4.4 Business continuity plans
  • 9.3.2 Management review input

ISO 27701:2019 · 4 controls

  • 5.4.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities
  • 5.6.3 Information security risk treatment
  • 5.7.3 Management review
  • 5.8.1 Nonconformity and corrective action

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 4 controls

  • 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • 6.1.3 AI risk treatment
  • 8.3 AI risk treatment
  • 9.3 Management review
  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-02 Improvements are identified from security tests and exercises, including those done in coordination with suppliers and relevant third parties
  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04 Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-06 Risk responses are chosen, prioritized, planned, tracked, and communicated

APRA CPS 234 · 2 controls

  • CPS234-28 Escalation of Unremediated Testing Deficiencies
  • CPS234-36 APRA Notification of Material Control Weakness within 10 Business Days

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

  • CIS-18.3 Remediate Penetration Test Findings
  • CIS-7.2 Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

PCI DSS 4.0 · 2 controls

  • 11.4.4 11.4.4 Correct exploitable findings from penetration tests
  • 12.4.2.1 12.4.2.1 Documentation of quarterly operational reviews
  • ANSSI-HYG-38 Carry Out Regular Security Checks and Audits and Apply the Corrective Actions
  • CPS230-P31 Remediation of Material Operational Risk Weaknesses
  • AUCDR-IS-STEP4 Step 4 - Implement a formal controls assessment program
  • ASBv3-PV-6 Rapidly and automatically remediate vulnerabilities

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-OPS-22 Testing and Documentation of known Vulnerabilities
  • CFTC-SS-21 Remediation of Vulnerabilities and Deficiencies

FedRAMP High · 1 control

  • CA-5 Plan of Action and Milestones

FedRAMP Moderate · 1 control

  • CA-5 Plan of Action and Milestones

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

  • Art.21.4 Take corrective measures without undue delay on finding that the measures are not met

NIST SP 800-218 · 1 control

  • 53A-3.4 Analyze Assessment Report Results

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Security Assessment

You are reading one control. How much of CMMC 2.0 have you already done?

CMMC 2.0 CA.L2-3.12.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of CMMC 2.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold FedRAMP Moderate and 108 of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 1 were rejected on the FedRAMP Moderate pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 47 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.