NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 NIST-CSF-RS.AN-03: Analysis is performed to establish what has taken place during an incident and the root cause of the incident

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 62 controls across 36 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 6 controls

NIST800-AU-12 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
NIST800-AU-6 AU-6 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
NIST800-IR-4 IR-4 Incident Handling
NIST800-RA-10 RA-10 Threat Hunting
NIST800-SI-4 SI-4 System Monitoring
NIST800-SI-6 SI-6 Security and Privacy Function Verification

CIS Controls v8 · 3 controls

CIS-10.7 Use Behavior-Based Anti-Malware Software
CIS-8.11 Conduct Audit Log Reviews
CIS-8.5 Collect Detailed Audit Logs

FedRAMP High · 3 controls

AU-6 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
IR-4 Incident Handling
IR-9(4) Information Spillage Response | Exposure to Unauthorized Personnel (IR-9(4))

FedRAMP Moderate · 3 controls

AU-6 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
IR-4 Incident Handling
IR-9(4) Information Spillage Response | Exposure to Unauthorized Personnel (IR-9(4))

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
5.26 Response to information security incidents
5.28 Collection of evidence

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
5.26 Response to information security incidents
5.28 Collection of evidence

SOC 2 · 3 controls

SOC2-CC7.2 CC7.2 Monitoring system components for anomalies
SOC2-CC7.3 CC7.3 Evaluating security events to identify incidents
SOC2-CC7.5 CC7.5 Recovering from security incidents

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 2 controls

SEC04-BP03 Correlate and enrich security alerts
SEC10-BP03 Prepare forensic capabilities

Australian Information Security Manual · 2 controls

ISM-1609 Consulting system owners before allowing intrusions to continue
ISM-1970 Dedicated malware analysis environment

CMMC 2.0 · 2 controls

AU.L2-3.3.3 Event Review
AU.L2-3.3.5 Audit Correlation

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-LOG-05 Audit Logs Monitoring and Response
CCM-SEF-06 Event Triage Processes

HIPAA Security Rule · 2 controls

164.308(a)(6)(i) Security Incident Procedures (Standard)
164.308(a)(6)(ii) Response and Reporting (Required)

ISO 27701:2019 · 2 controls

6.13 Information security incident management
6.13.1 Management of information security incidents and improvements

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

03.03.06 Audit Record Reduction and Report Generation
03.06.01 Incident Handling

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 2 controls

164.308(a)(6)(i) Security Incident Procedures (Standard)
164.308(a)(6)(ii) Response and Reporting (Required)

PCI DSS 4.0 · 2 controls

11.5.1.1 11.5.1.1 Service providers detect covert malware channels
12.10.7 12.10.7 Response procedures for PAN found in unexpected locations

ACSC Essential Eight · 1 control

E8-APP-ML3 Application Control (ML3)

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-33 Capture network traffic (Limited)

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-IR-4 Detection and analysis - investigate an incident

BIMCO Cyber Security · 1 control

BIMCO-10.5 Investigating cyber incidents

Belgium CyberFundamentals · 1 control

BE-CF-21 Forensic analysis capabilities

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-SIM-02 Processing of security incidents

CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) · 1 control

CIRCIA-2242c4 Required Contents of a Covered Cyber Incident Report

Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) · 1 control

AUCSA-CIRB-REVIEW Conduct of no-fault post-incident reviews

DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information · 1 control

DFARS-7012-f Access to additional information or equipment for forensic analysis

Defence Industry Security Program (DISP) · 1 control

DISP-ICT-INCIDENT Cyber incident detection and response

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) · 1 control

DSPF-P24 Information and technology security - incident management

EU Cyber Resilience Act · 1 control

Art. 14(4)(c) Final incident report within one month of the notification

GDPR · 1 control

GDPR-Art.33 Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 1.0 · 1 control

RS.AN-3 RS.AN-3: Forensics are performed

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 1.1 · 1 control

RS.AN-3 RS.AN-3: Forensics are performed

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-AU-6 Audit Review, Analysis, and Reporting

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.6.1e Establish Security Operations Center (SOC)

NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 · 1 control

RS.AN-03 RS.AN-03 Sequence of events, actors and root causes of the incident established

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 have you already done?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 NIST-CSF-RS.AN-03 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 73 of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27001:202268.9% covered · 33 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 567.9% covered · 34 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)67% covered · 35 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate63.2% covered · 39 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202258.5% covered · 44 gaps If you hold CIS Controls v853.8% covered · 49 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 174 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free