CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) CFTC-SS-36: Internal Reporting and Review by Senior Management and the Board

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 36 controls across 15 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management · 6 controls

CPS230-13 Board Accountability for Operational Risk Management
CPS230-16 Internal Audit Review of the Business Continuity Plan
CPS230-66 Review of Operational Risk Management
CPS230-8 Board Oversight, Approval of the BCP, Tolerance Levels and Service Provider Policy
CPS230-P23 Senior Management Information to the Board on Resilience Decisions
CPS230-P30 Monitoring, Review and Testing of Control Effectiveness

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 4 controls

CCM-A&A-05 Audit Management Process
CCM-A&A-06 Remediation
CCM-GRC-01 Governance Program Policy and Procedures
CCM-TVM-09 Vulnerability Management Reporting

ISO 22301:2019 · 4 controls

10.2 Continual improvement
5.1 Leadership and commitment
9.3 Management review
9.3.2 Management review input

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 4 controls

NIST-CSF-GV.OV-01 Cybersecurity risk management strategy outcomes are reviewed to inform and adjust strategy and direction
NIST-CSF-GV.OV-03 Organizational cybersecurity risk management performance is evaluated and reviewed for adjustments needed
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-05 Lines of communication across the organization are established for cybersecurity risks, including risks from suppliers and other third parties
NIST-CSF-GV.RR-01 Organizational leadership is responsible and accountable for cybersecurity risk and fosters a culture that is risk-aware, ethical, and continually improving

SOC 2 · 3 controls

SOC2-CC1.2 CC1.2 Board independence and oversight of internal control (COSO principle 2)
SOC2-CC2.2 CC2.2 Internal communication of objectives and control responsibilities (COSO principle 14)
SOC2-CC4.2 CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

C5-COM-04 Information on information security performance and management assessment of the ISMS
C5-OPS-20 Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Measurements, Analyses and Assessments of Procedures

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

CA-5 Plan of Action and Milestones
CA-6 Authorization

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

CA-5 Plan of Action and Milestones
CA-6 Authorization

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 2 controls

161R1-CA-5 Plan of Action and Milestones
161R1-PM-6 Measures of Performance

PCI DSS 4.0 · 2 controls

12.4.1 12.4.1 Executive responsibility for a PCI DSS compliance program
12.4.2.1 12.4.2.1 Documentation of quarterly operational reviews

DORA · 1 control

DORA-Art.5 Governance and organisation

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(2) Assigned Security Responsibility (Standard)

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.03.05 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-PM-6 PM-6 Measures of Performance

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(2) Assigned Security Responsibility (Standard)

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) have you already done?

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) CFTC-SS-36 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and 28 of 39 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.071.8% covered · 11 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate69.2% covered · 12 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.161.5% covered · 15 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)59% covered · 16 gaps If you hold DORA51.3% covered · 19 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-161 Rev 148.7% covered · 20 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 5 were rejected on the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free