Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2vsNIST SP 800-66 Rev 2

See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

207
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
72%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC 2 maps to NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 with 72% coverage across 44 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 SOC 2 controls identifies 17 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in P - Privacy.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 207 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

A - Availability(14 mappings)

SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability6 targets
164.308(a)(7)(ii)(A)Data Backup Plan (Required)
164.308(a)(7)(ii)(B)Disaster Recovery Plan (Required)
164.308(a)(7)(ii)(E)Applications and Data Criticality Analysis (Addressable)
164.310(a)(2)(i)Contingency Operations (Addressable)
164.310(a)(2)(iv)Maintenance Records (Addressable)
164.310(d)(2)(iv)Data Backup and Storage (Addressable)
SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures8 targets
164.308(a)(7)(i)Contingency Plan (Standard)
164.308(a)(7)(ii)(A)Data Backup Plan (Required)
164.308(a)(7)(ii)(B)Disaster Recovery Plan (Required)
164.308(a)(7)(ii)(C)Emergency Mode Operation Plan (Required)
164.308(a)(7)(ii)(D)Testing and Revision Procedures (Addressable)
164.310(a)(2)(i)Contingency Operations (Addressable)
164.310(d)(2)(iv)Data Backup and Storage (Addressable)
164.312(a)(2)(ii)Emergency Access Procedure (Required)

C - Confidentiality(6 mappings)

SOC2-C1.1Confidential information is identified and protected during receipt, processing, storage6 targets
164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A)Risk Analysis (Required)
164.308(a)(4)(ii)(A)Isolating Health Care Clearinghouse Functions (Required if applicable)
164.308(a)(7)(ii)(E)Applications and Data Criticality Analysis (Addressable)
164.310(b)Workstation Use (Standard)
164.310(d)(1)Device and Media Controls (Standard)
164.312(a)(1)Access Control (Standard)

+187 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A SOC 2 to NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls your existing SOC 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

SOC 2 into NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 into SOC 2
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

SOC 2 to NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 72% in the header counts how many SOC 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SOC 2 and NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2?

SOC 2 has 61 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 covers 65 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 44 overlapping controls (72% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in P - Privacy, where 11 SOC 2 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC 2 and NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2?

Of 61 total SOC 2 controls, 44 map directly to NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls, representing 72% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2?

17 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in P - Privacy with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2?

The domain with the highest gap count is P - Privacy (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.