Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2vsFedRAMP High

See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to FedRAMP High. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

726
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
85%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC 2 maps to FedRAMP High with 85% coverage across 52 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 SOC 2 controls identifies 11 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in P - Privacy.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 726 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

A - Availability(20 mappings)

SOC2-A1.1A1.1 Managing processing capacity6 targets
→AU-4Audit Log Storage Capacity
→CP-7(2)Alternate Processing Site | Accessibility (CP-7(2))
→CP-8(1)Telecommunications Services | Priority of Service Provisions (CP-8(1))
→MA-6Timely Maintenance (MA-6)
→SC-22Architecture and Provisioning for Name/Address Resolution Service
→SC-5Denial-of-Service Protection
SOC2-A1.2A1.2 Environmental protection, backup and recovery infrastructure14 targets
→CP-10System Recovery and Reconstitution
→CP-2Contingency Plan
→CP-2(8)Contingency Plan | Identify Critical Assets (CP-2(8))
→CP-6Alternate Storage Site
→CP-6(3)Alternate Storage Site | Accessibility (CP-6(3))
→CP-7Alternate Processing Site
→CP-7(1)Alternate Processing Site | Separation from Primary Site (CP-7(1))
→CP-8Telecommunications Services
→CP-8(1)Telecommunications Services | Priority of Service Provisions (CP-8(1))
→CP-8(2)Telecommunications Services | Single Points of Failure (CP-8(2))
→CP-9System Backup
→CP-9(1)Testing for Reliability and Integrity
→IR-3Incident Response Testing
→MA-2Controlled Maintenance

+706 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A SOC 2 to FedRAMP High crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP High controls your existing SOC 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

SOC 2 into FedRAMP High
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

FedRAMP High into SOC 2
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

SOC 2 to FedRAMP High (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 85% in the header counts how many SOC 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP High controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SOC 2 and FedRAMP High?

SOC 2 has 61 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP High covers 410 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 52 overlapping controls (85% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in P - Privacy, where 9 SOC 2 controls have no direct FedRAMP High equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC 2 and FedRAMP High?

Of 61 total SOC 2 controls, 52 map directly to FedRAMP High controls, representing 85% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to FedRAMP High?

11 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP High. The highest concentration of gaps is in P - Privacy with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and FedRAMP High?

The domain with the highest gap count is P - Privacy (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.