TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2vsITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications

See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
47
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC 2 maps to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications with 13% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 SOC 2 controls identifies 47 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CC - Common Criteria (Security).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

A - Availability(3 mappings)

SOC2-A1.1Maintains capacity to meet availability commitments
→X805-Dim7-Availability-Network-Resources-Information-Authorized-Access-No-Service-DenialITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 7 - Availability + Network Resources + Information Accessible to Authorized Users + Denial-of-Service Prevention + Resilience + Redundancy + Disaster Recovery + Business Continuity + DDoS Mitigation
SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability
→X805-Dim7-Availability-Network-Resources-Information-Authorized-Access-No-Service-DenialITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 7 - Availability + Network Resources + Information Accessible to Authorized Users + Denial-of-Service Prevention + Resilience + Redundancy + Disaster Recovery + Business Continuity + DDoS Mitigation
SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
→X805-Dim7-Availability-Network-Resources-Information-Authorized-Access-No-Service-DenialITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 7 - Availability + Network Resources + Information Accessible to Authorized Users + Denial-of-Service Prevention + Resilience + Redundancy + Disaster Recovery + Business Continuity + DDoS Mitigation

CC - Common Criteria (Security)(1 mappings)

SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
→X805-Dim1-Access-Control-RBAC-Authorization-Resources-Network-Elements-Services-ApplicationsITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 1 - Access Control + Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) + Authorization + Resources + Network Elements + Services + Applications + Access Limitations + Authorized Personnel + Discretionary + Mandatory Access Control

P - Privacy(3 mappings)

SOC2-P3.1Personal information is collected consistent with privacy commitments
→X805-Dim8-Privacy-Identification-Network-Activity-Personal-Information-ConfidentialityITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 8 - Privacy + Identification of Network Activity + Personal Information Confidentiality + Subscriber Anonymity + Pseudonymity + Anti-Tracking + Location Privacy + Data Minimization + GDPR/CCPA Alignment
SOC2-P4.3Personal information is securely disposed of
→X805-Dim8-Privacy-Identification-Network-Activity-Personal-Information-ConfidentialityITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 8 - Privacy + Identification of Network Activity + Personal Information Confidentiality + Subscriber Anonymity + Pseudonymity + Anti-Tracking + Location Privacy + Data Minimization + GDPR/CCPA Alignment
SOC2-P6.1Personal information is disclosed to third parties only as committed
→X805-Dim8-Privacy-Identification-Network-Activity-Personal-Information-ConfidentialityITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 8 - Privacy + Identification of Network Activity + Personal Information Confidentiality + Subscriber Anonymity + Pseudonymity + Anti-Tracking + Location Privacy + Data Minimization + GDPR/CCPA Alignment

Related Comparisons

Other SOC 2 comparisons

SOC 2 vs AICPA SOC 331 mappingsSOC 2 vs C5 (Germany)22 mappingsSOC 2 vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)13 mappingsSOC 2 vs Azure Security Benchmark11 mappingsSOC 2 vs ISO/IEC 27400:20229 mappingsSOC 2 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.09 mappingsSOC 2 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)8 mappingsSOC 2 vs ISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT8 mappings

Other ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications comparisons

NIST Privacy Framework vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsMARS-E vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between SOC 2 and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

SOC 2 has 54 controls across its framework, while ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CC - Common Criteria (Security), where 30 SOC 2 controls have no direct ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC 2 and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

Of 54 total SOC 2 controls, 7 map directly to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 47 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

47 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. The highest concentration of gaps is in CC - Common Criteria (Security) with 30 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

The domain with the highest gap count is CC - Common Criteria (Security) (30 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.