TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)vsITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications

See exactly how SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) controls map to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
63
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) maps to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications with 6% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 67 SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) controls identifies 63 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SOC 2 - Security (Common Criteria).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 67 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

SOC 2 - Additional Trust Services Categories(3 mappings)

SSAE18-A1.1A1.1 - Availability Commitments and Requirements
→X805-Dim7-Availability-Network-Resources-Information-Authorized-Access-No-Service-DenialITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 7 - Availability + Network Resources + Information Accessible to Authorized Users + Denial-of-Service Prevention + Resilience + Redundancy + Disaster Recovery + Business Continuity + DDoS Mitigation
SSAE18-P1.1P1.1 - Privacy Notice
→X805-Dim8-Privacy-Identification-Network-Activity-Personal-Information-ConfidentialityITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 8 - Privacy + Identification of Network Activity + Personal Information Confidentiality + Subscriber Anonymity + Pseudonymity + Anti-Tracking + Location Privacy + Data Minimization + GDPR/CCPA Alignment
SSAE18-P1.2P1.2 - Choice and Consent
→X805-Dim8-Privacy-Identification-Network-Activity-Personal-Information-ConfidentialityITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 8 - Privacy + Identification of Network Activity + Personal Information Confidentiality + Subscriber Anonymity + Pseudonymity + Anti-Tracking + Location Privacy + Data Minimization + GDPR/CCPA Alignment

SOC 2 - Logical and Physical Access Controls(1 mappings)

SSAE18-CC6.2CC6.2 - New User Registration and Authorization
→X805-Dim2-Authentication-Identity-Verification-Claimed-Identities-Entities-CommunicationITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 2 - Authentication + Identity Verification + Claimed Identity + Entity Authentication + Data Origin Authentication + Mutual Authentication + Multi-Factor + Cryptographic Authentication

Related Comparisons

Other SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) comparisons

SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs Azure Security Benchmark14 mappingsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.013 mappingsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 513 mappingsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs SOC 213 mappingsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements12 mappingsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs ISO 2701812 mappingsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs NIST SP 800-19012 mappingsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar12 mappings

Other ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications comparisons

NIST Privacy Framework vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsMARS-E vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsSOC 2 vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) has 67 controls across its framework, while ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SOC 2 - Security (Common Criteria), where 12 SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) controls have no direct ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications equivalent.

How many controls map between SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

Of 67 total SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) controls, 4 map directly to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 63 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

63 SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) controls have no direct equivalent in ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. The highest concentration of gaps is in SOC 2 - Security (Common Criteria) with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

The domain with the highest gap count is SOC 2 - Security (Common Criteria) (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.