TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2vsC5 (Germany)

See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to C5 (Germany). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
41%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC 2 maps to C5 (Germany) with 41% coverage across 22 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 SOC 2 controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in P - Privacy.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 425K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 425K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

A - Availability(4 mappings)

SOC2-A1.1Maintains capacity to meet availability commitments
→C5-OPS-01Capacity Management - Planning
SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability2 targets
→C5-BCM-01Top management responsibility
→C5-OPS-06Data Backup and Recovery - Concept
SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
→C5-BCM-04Verification, updating and testing of the business continuity

CC - Common Criteria (Security)(16 mappings)

SOC2-CC1.1COSO principle 1: Demonstrates commitment to integrity and ethical values
→C5-OIS-01Information Security Management System (ISMS)
SOC2-CC1.2COSO principle 2: Board exercises oversight responsibility
→C5-OIS-02Information Security Policy
SOC2-CC2.2COSO principle 14: Internally communicates information including objectives and responsibilities
→C5-SP-01Documentation, communication and provision of policies and instructions
SOC2-CC3.1COSO principle 6: Specifies objectives to identify and assess risks
→C5-OIS-06Risk Management Policy
SOC2-CC3.2COSO principle 7: Identifies risks and analyzes to determine how managed
→C5-OIS-07Application of the Risk Management Policy
SOC2-CC4.1COSO principle 16: Selects and develops ongoing and separate evaluations
→C5-COM-03Internal audits of the information security management system
SOC2-CC5.1COSO principle 10: Selects and develops control activities to mitigate risks
→C5-OIS-04Segregation of Duties
SOC2-CC6.1Logical and physical access security for information and assets3 targets
→C5-IDM-01Policy for user accounts and access rights
→C5-IDM-09Authentication mechanisms
→C5-PSS-05Authentication Mechanisms
SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced2 targets
→C5-IDM-05Regular review of access rights
→C5-PSS-09Authorisation Mechanisms
SOC2-CC6.6Measures against threats outside system boundaries are implemented
→C5-COS-01Technical safeguards
SOC2-CC6.7Transmission of data is restricted to authorized users
→C5-CRY-01Policy for the use of encryption procedures and key management
SOC2-CC7.1Detection and monitoring procedures for security events are in place
→C5-OPS-18Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Concept
SOC2-CC7.2Monitors system components for anomalies indicating malicious acts
→C5-OPS-10Logging and Monitoring - Concept

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 715 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other SOC 2 comparisons

SOC 2 vs ISO 27001:202239 mappingsSOC 2 vs AICPA SOC 331 mappingsSOC 2 vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)13 mappingsSOC 2 vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)12 mappingsSOC 2 vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange12 mappingsSOC 2 vs Azure Security Benchmark11 mappingsSOC 2 vs SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination11 mappingsSOC 2 vs South Korea ISMS-P10 mappings

Other C5 (Germany) comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs C5 (Germany)28 mappingsISO 27017 vs C5 (Germany)9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 715 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (425K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between SOC 2 and C5 (Germany)?

SOC 2 has 54 controls across its framework, while C5 (Germany) covers 121 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 22 overlapping controls (41% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in P - Privacy, where 13 SOC 2 controls have no direct C5 (Germany) equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC 2 and C5 (Germany)?

Of 54 total SOC 2 controls, 22 map directly to C5 (Germany) controls — representing 41% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to C5 (Germany)?

32 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in C5 (Germany). The highest concentration of gaps is in P - Privacy with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and C5 (Germany)?

The domain with the highest gap count is P - Privacy (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.