Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3vsC5 (Germany)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls map to C5 (Germany). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

173
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
90%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which C5 (Germany) controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 maps to C5 (Germany) with 90% coverage across 87 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 97 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls identifies 10 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in 03.01 AC (Access Control).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 97 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 173 mapped controls across 17 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

03.01 AC (Access Control)(20 mappings)

03.01.01Account Management5 targets
→C5-IDM-01Policy for user accounts and access rights
→C5-IDM-02Granting and change of user accounts and access rights
→C5-IDM-03Locking and withdrawal of user accounts in the event of inactivity or multiple failed logins
→C5-IDM-05Regular review of access rights
→C5-PSS-08Roles and Rights Concept
03.01.02Access Enforcement2 targets
→C5-IDM-01Policy for user accounts and access rights
→C5-PSS-09Authorisation Mechanisms
03.01.03Information Flow Enforcement
→C5-COS-06Segregation of data traffic in jointly used network environments
03.01.04Separation of Duties
→C5-OIS-04Segregation of Duties
03.01.05Least Privilege4 targets
→C5-COM-02Policy for planning and conducting audits
→C5-IDM-04Withdraw or adjust access rights as the task area changes
→C5-IDM-05Regular review of access rights
→C5-IDM-06Privileged access rights
03.01.06Least Privilege - Privileged Accounts
→C5-IDM-06Privileged access rights
03.01.07Least Privilege - Privileged Functions
→C5-OPS-15Logging and Monitoring - Accountability
03.01.08Unsuccessful Logon Attempts
→C5-IDM-03Locking and withdrawal of user accounts in the event of inactivity or multiple failed logins
03.01.10Device Lock
→C5-PSS-06Session Management
03.01.11Session Termination
→C5-PSS-06Session Management
03.01.12Remote Access2 targets
→C5-COS-04Cross-network access
→C5-COS-05Networks for administration

+153 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 to C5 (Germany) crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which C5 (Germany) controls your existing NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into C5 (Germany) lands at 50.4%, while C5 (Germany) into NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 lands at 68%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 evidence buys you for C5 (Germany), the other asks the reverse.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into C5 (Germany)
50.4%

61 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. 60 are genuine gaps.

C5 (Germany) into NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3
68%

66 of 97 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for C5 (Germany). 31 are genuine gaps.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 to C5 (Germany)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 90% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many C5 (Germany) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 and C5 (Germany)?

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 has 97 controls across its framework, while C5 (Germany) covers 121 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 87 overlapping controls (90% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 03.01 AC (Access Control), where 3 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls have no direct C5 (Germany) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 and C5 (Germany)?

Of 97 total NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls, 87 map directly to C5 (Germany) controls, representing 90% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 to C5 (Germany)?

10 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls have no direct equivalent in C5 (Germany). The highest concentration of gaps is in 03.01 AC (Access Control) with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 and C5 (Germany)?

The domain with the highest gap count is 03.01 AC (Access Control) (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.