Cross-Framework Mapping

FedRAMP ModeratevsC5 (Germany)

See exactly how FedRAMP Moderate controls map to C5 (Germany). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

362
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
67%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which C5 (Germany) controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FedRAMP Moderate maps to C5 (Germany) with 67% coverage across 216 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls identifies 107 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in AC - Access Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 323 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 362 mapped controls across 18 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

AC - Access Control(20 mappings)

AC-1Policy and Procedures2 targets
→C5-IDM-01Policy for user accounts and access rights
→C5-SP-01Documentation, communication and provision of policies and instructions
AC-12Session Termination
→C5-PSS-06Session Management
AC-17Remote Access2 targets
→C5-COS-04Cross-network access
→C5-COS-05Networks for administration
AC-17(1)Monitoring and Control
→C5-COS-03Monitoring of connections in the Cloud Service Provider's network
AC-17(2)Protection of Confidentiality and Integrity Using Encryption
→C5-CRY-02Encryption of data for transmission (transport encryption)
AC-17(3)Managed Access Control Points
→C5-COS-05Networks for administration
AC-17(4)Privileged Commands and Access
→C5-IDM-06Privileged access rights
AC-19Access Control for Mobile Devices
→C5-AM-02Acceptable Use and Safe Handling of Assets Policy
AC-2Account Management5 targets
→C5-IDM-01Policy for user accounts and access rights
→C5-IDM-02Granting and change of user accounts and access rights
→C5-IDM-03Locking and withdrawal of user accounts in the event of inactivity or multiple failed logins
→C5-IDM-04Withdraw or adjust access rights as the task area changes
→C5-IDM-05Regular review of access rights
AC-2(13)Disable Accounts for High-Risk Individuals
→C5-IDM-04Withdraw or adjust access rights as the task area changes
AC-2(3)Disable Accounts
→C5-IDM-03Locking and withdrawal of user accounts in the event of inactivity or multiple failed logins
AC-2(5)Inactivity Logout
→C5-PSS-06Session Management
AC-2(7)Privileged User Accounts
→C5-IDM-06Privileged access rights
AC-20Use of External Systems
→C5-SSO-01Policies and instructions for controlling and monitoring third parties

+342 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The FedRAMP Moderate to C5 (Germany) crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which C5 (Germany) controls your existing FedRAMP Moderate work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. FedRAMP Moderate into C5 (Germany) lands at 71.1%, while C5 (Germany) into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 37.2%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your FedRAMP Moderate evidence buys you for C5 (Germany), the other asks the reverse.

FedRAMP Moderate into C5 (Germany)
71.1%

86 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 35 are genuine gaps.

C5 (Germany) into FedRAMP Moderate
37.2%

120 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for C5 (Germany). 203 are genuine gaps.

FedRAMP Moderate to C5 (Germany)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 67% in the header counts how many FedRAMP Moderate controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many C5 (Germany) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FedRAMP Moderate and C5 (Germany)?

FedRAMP Moderate has 323 controls across its framework, while C5 (Germany) covers 121 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 216 overlapping controls (67% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AC - Access Control, where 19 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct C5 (Germany) equivalent.

How many controls map between FedRAMP Moderate and C5 (Germany)?

Of 323 total FedRAMP Moderate controls, 216 map directly to C5 (Germany) controls, representing 67% coverage. The remaining 107 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Moderate to C5 (Germany)?

107 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct equivalent in C5 (Germany). The highest concentration of gaps is in AC - Access Control with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Moderate and C5 (Germany)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AC - Access Control (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.