TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and VerificationvsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 50% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 4 Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Private Deployment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 4 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Transparency Log(7 mappings)

SIGSTORE-2Transparency Log (Rekor) and Verification7 targets
→CPG-1.AChanging Default Passwords
→CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→CPG-2.AAsset Inventory
→CPG-2.BProhibit Connection of Unauthorized Devices
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation

Cosign(3 mappings)

SIGSTORE-3Sigstore for Containers and Artifacts (Cosign)3 targets
→CPG-3.ALog Collection
→CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
→CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS

Related Comparisons

Other Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification comparisons

Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification vs APPI2 mappingsSigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification vs Vietnam PDPD2 mappingsSigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification vs Turkey KVKK2 mappingsSigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification vs BSI IT-Grundschutz2 mappingsSigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 52 mappingsSigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification vs MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges2 mappingsSigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements2 mappingsSigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification vs ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary2 mappings

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification has 4 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Private Deployment, where 1 Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 4 total Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification controls, 2 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

2 Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Private Deployment with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Private Deployment (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.