Cross-Framework Mapping

PCI PIN SecurityvsICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)

See exactly how PCI PIN Security controls map to ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
40
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

PCI PIN Security maps to ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) with 7% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 PCI PIN Security controls identifies 40 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

PCI PIN Security: Third-Party Risk Management(3 mappings)

PCI-PIN-16Due diligence and onboarding
ICAO-ANX17-Chap2-ThreatAssessment-RiskManagement-Cyber-GASePICAO Annex 17 Chapter 2 - Threat Assessment + Risk Management + Cyber Threats to Critical Aviation Systems (Amendment 17/18)
PCI-PIN-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
ICAO-ANX17-Chap2-ThreatAssessment-RiskManagement-Cyber-GASePICAO Annex 17 Chapter 2 - Threat Assessment + Risk Management + Cyber Threats to Critical Aviation Systems (Amendment 17/18)
PCI-PIN-19Concentration risk management
ICAO-ANX17-Chap2-ThreatAssessment-RiskManagement-Cyber-GASePICAO Annex 17 Chapter 2 - Threat Assessment + Risk Management + Cyber Threats to Critical Aviation Systems (Amendment 17/18)
Coverage crosswalk

A PCI PIN Security to ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) controls your existing PCI PIN Security work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

PCI PIN Security into ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) into PCI PIN Security
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

PCI PIN Security to ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 7% in the header counts how many PCI PIN Security controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between PCI PIN Security and ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)?

PCI PIN Security has 43 controls across its framework, while ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Key Management, where 11 PCI PIN Security controls have no direct ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) equivalent.

How many controls map between PCI PIN Security and ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)?

Of 43 total PCI PIN Security controls, 3 map directly to ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) controls, representing 7% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping PCI PIN Security to ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)?

40 PCI PIN Security controls have no direct equivalent in ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC). The highest concentration of gaps is in Key Management with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between PCI PIN Security and ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Key Management (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.