Cross-Framework Mapping

PCI PIN SecurityvsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)

See exactly how PCI PIN Security controls map to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
28%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

PCI PIN Security maps to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) with 28% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 PCI PIN Security controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

PCI PIN Security: Cybersecurity Controls(3 mappings)

PCI-PIN-06Network security and segmentation
CAT-D3-1Preventative controls
PCI-PIN-07Endpoint protection and detection
CAT-D3-1Preventative controls
PCI-PIN-10Secure configuration standards
CAT-D3-3Corrective controls

PCI PIN Security: Operational Resilience(3 mappings)

PCI-PIN-13Third-party dependency management
CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing
PCI-PIN-14Critical service identification
CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing
PCI-PIN-15Communication and escalation procedures
CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing

PCI PIN Security: Third-Party Risk Management(6 mappings)

PCI-PIN-16Due diligence and onboarding2 targets
CAT-D1-2Risk management
CAT-ML-2Evolving
PCI-PIN-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment2 targets
CAT-D1-2Risk management
CAT-ML-2Evolving
PCI-PIN-19Concentration risk management2 targets
CAT-D1-2Risk management
CAT-ML-2Evolving

PCI PIN Security: Incident Management & Reporting(3 mappings)

PCI-PIN-23Regulatory reporting requirements
CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy
PCI-PIN-24Customer notification procedures
CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy
PCI-PIN-25Post-incident review and improvement
CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between PCI PIN Security and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

PCI PIN Security has 43 controls across its framework, while FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Key Management, where 11 PCI PIN Security controls have no direct FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) equivalent.

How many controls map between PCI PIN Security and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

Of 43 total PCI PIN Security controls, 12 map directly to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping PCI PIN Security to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

31 PCI PIN Security controls have no direct equivalent in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). The highest concentration of gaps is in Key Management with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between PCI PIN Security and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Key Management (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.