TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

PCI PIN SecurityvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how PCI PIN Security controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

34
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
30%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

PCI PIN Security maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 30% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 PCI PIN Security controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 34 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

PCI PIN Security: Information Security Governance(2 mappings)

PCI-PIN-05Roles and responsibilities definition2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed

PCI PIN Security: Cybersecurity Controls(2 mappings)

PCI-PIN-08Application security controls
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-06Secure software development practices are integrated throughout the SDLC
PCI-PIN-10Secure configuration standards
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied

PCI PIN Security: Operational Resilience(12 mappings)

PCI-PIN-12Disaster recovery procedures3 targets
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06End-of-recovery is declared based on criteria and documentation
→NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05Criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied
PCI-PIN-13Third-party dependency management3 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained
PCI-PIN-14Critical service identification3 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained
PCI-PIN-15Communication and escalation procedures3 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained

PCI PIN Security: Third-Party Risk Management(4 mappings)

PCI-PIN-16Due diligence and onboarding3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
PCI-PIN-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk

+14 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other PCI PIN Security comparisons

PCI PIN Security vs PSD2 SCA17 mappingsPCI PIN Security vs PCI P2PE17 mappingsPCI PIN Security vs FFIEC IT Examination Handbook17 mappingsPCI PIN Security vs APRA CPS 23417 mappingsPCI PIN Security vs PCI SSF17 mappingsPCI PIN Security vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents12 mappingsPCI PIN Security vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)12 mappingsPCI PIN Security vs ISO 27001:202211 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.082 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.025 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between PCI PIN Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

PCI PIN Security has 43 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Key Management, where 11 PCI PIN Security controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between PCI PIN Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 43 total PCI PIN Security controls, 13 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping PCI PIN Security to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

30 PCI PIN Security controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Key Management with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between PCI PIN Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Key Management (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.