Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsOWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
44%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 with 44% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Authorization and Access Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Authorization and Access Control(8 mappings)

A01:2025Broken Access Control3 targets
LLM05-2025Improper Output Handling
LLM06-2025Excessive Agency
LLM07-2025System Prompt Leakage
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration2 targets
LLM02-2025Sensitive Information Disclosure
LLM07-2025System Prompt Leakage
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization3 targets
LLM05-2025Improper Output Handling
LLM06-2025Excessive Agency
LLM07-2025System Prompt Leakage

Supply Chain and Dependencies(2 mappings)

A03:2025Software Supply Chain Failures
LLM03-2025Supply Chain Vulnerabilities
AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management
LLM03-2025Supply Chain Vulnerabilities

Design and Architecture(3 mappings)

A06:2025Insecure Design3 targets
LLM05-2025Improper Output Handling
LLM06-2025Excessive Agency
LLM07-2025System Prompt Leakage

Authentication and Session Management(2 mappings)

A07:2025Authentication Failures2 targets
LLM02-2025Sensitive Information Disclosure
LLM07-2025System Prompt Leakage

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 16 controls across its framework, while OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (44% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Authorization and Access Control, where 2 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025?

Of 16 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 7 map directly to OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 controls — representing 44% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025?

9 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025. The highest concentration of gaps is in Authorization and Access Control with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025?

The domain with the highest gap count is Authorization and Access Control (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.