Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsOWASP API Security Top 10:2023

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to OWASP API Security Top 10:2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
44%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 with 44% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Supply Chain and Dependencies.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Authorization and Access Control(9 mappings)

A01:2025Broken Access Control3 targets
API1:2023Broken Object Level Authorization
API3:2023Broken Object Property Level Authorization
API5:2023Broken Function Level Authorization
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration2 targets
API2:2023Broken Authentication
API8:2023Security Misconfiguration
FHIR-SEC-3.2Consent-Based Access Control
API5:2023Broken Function Level Authorization
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization3 targets
API1:2023Broken Object Level Authorization
API3:2023Broken Object Property Level Authorization
API5:2023Broken Function Level Authorization

Cryptography and Data Protection(1 mappings)

A04:2025Cryptographic Failures
API8:2023Security Misconfiguration

Design and Architecture(3 mappings)

A06:2025Insecure Design3 targets
API1:2023Broken Object Level Authorization
API3:2023Broken Object Property Level Authorization
API5:2023Broken Function Level Authorization

Authentication and Session Management(1 mappings)

A07:2025Authentication Failures
API2:2023Broken Authentication

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and OWASP API Security Top 10:2023?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 16 controls across its framework, while OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (44% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Supply Chain and Dependencies, where 4 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and OWASP API Security Top 10:2023?

Of 16 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 7 map directly to OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 controls — representing 44% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to OWASP API Security Top 10:2023?

9 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP API Security Top 10:2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in Supply Chain and Dependencies with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and OWASP API Security Top 10:2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is Supply Chain and Dependencies (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.