Cross-Framework Mapping

FDA 21 CFR Part 11vsOWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023

See exactly how FDA 21 CFR Part 11 controls map to OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 maps to OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 with 23% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 13 FDA 21 CFR Part 11 controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 21 CFR Part 11 - Validation, Audit Trail, Operational Controls (§11.10(a) + (e) + (f)).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 13 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

21 CFR Part 11 Subpart B - Electronic Records (§11.30 Open Systems, §11.50 + §11.70 Signature Manifestations and Linking)(1 mappings)

Part11.30Controls for open systems (21 CFR §11.30)
OWASPAPI-6Security Misconfiguration and Secure API Design

21 CFR Part 11 Subpart C - Electronic Signatures (§11.200 + §11.300 Components, Controls, ID Codes and Passwords)(1 mappings)

Part11.300Controls for identification codes and passwords (21 CFR §11.300)
OWASPAPI-2Broken Authentication and Token Management

21 CFR Part 11 - Validation, Audit Trail, Operational Controls (§11.10(a) + (e) + (f))(2 mappings)

Part11.AccessAndAuthAccess control + authority + device checks (21 CFR §11.10(d) + (f) + (g) + (h))2 targets
OWASPAPI-1Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) and BFLA
OWASPAPI-3Broken Object Property Level Authorization (BOPLA)

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023?

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 has 13 controls across its framework, while OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 21 CFR Part 11 - Validation, Audit Trail, Operational Controls (§11.10(a) + (e) + (f)), where 3 FDA 21 CFR Part 11 controls have no direct OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023?

Of 13 total FDA 21 CFR Part 11 controls, 3 map directly to OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FDA 21 CFR Part 11 to OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023?

10 FDA 21 CFR Part 11 controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in 21 CFR Part 11 - Validation, Audit Trail, Operational Controls (§11.10(a) + (e) + (f)) with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is 21 CFR Part 11 - Validation, Audit Trail, Operational Controls (§11.10(a) + (e) + (f)) (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.