TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
42%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification with 42% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SSRF.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Access Control(3 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control3 targets
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
→ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
→ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance

Cryptography(2 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management2 targets
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
→ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management

Secure Design(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)
→ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management

Component Security(2 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components2 targets
→ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul

Authentication(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul

Logging and Monitoring(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
→ORANWG11-7Logging, Monitoring, Incident Response, and Denial-of-Service Resilience

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons

OWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security10 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.010 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs South Korea ISMS-P10 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)9 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST Privacy Framework9 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts9 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements9 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 59 mappings

Other O-RAN WG11 Security Specification comparisons

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification6 mappingsOpen Banking Security vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsFFIEC IT Examination Handbook vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 19 controls across its framework, while O-RAN WG11 Security Specification covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (42% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SSRF, where 1 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct O-RAN WG11 Security Specification equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

Of 19 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 6 map directly to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls — representing 42% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

4 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. The highest concentration of gaps is in SSRF with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

The domain with the highest gap count is SSRF (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.