TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP MASVSvsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification

See exactly how OWASP MASVS controls map to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP MASVS maps to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 OWASP MASVS controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Resilience and Anti-Tampering.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Cryptography(1 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-2MASVS-CRYPTO: Cryptography Usage
→ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management

Authentication and Authorization(2 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-3MASVS-AUTH: Authentication and Authorization2 targets
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
→ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management

Network Communication(2 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-4MASVS-NETWORK: Network Communication2 targets
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
→ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management

Code Quality and Build(1 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-6MASVS-CODE: Code Quality, Build Settings, and Updates
→ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

Privacy(4 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-8MASVS-PRIVACY: Privacy and Data Protection4 targets
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
→ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
→ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance
→ORANWG11-7Logging, Monitoring, Incident Response, and Denial-of-Service Resilience

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP MASVS comparisons

OWASP MASVS vs ISO 270177 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs ISO/SAE 214347 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs ISO 270437 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar7 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs Azure Security Benchmark7 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs ISO 270187 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs MITRE ATT&CK7 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment)7 mappings

Other O-RAN WG11 Security Specification comparisons

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification6 mappingsOpen Banking Security vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsFFIEC IT Examination Handbook vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP MASVS and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

OWASP MASVS has 8 controls across its framework, while O-RAN WG11 Security Specification covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Resilience and Anti-Tampering, where 1 OWASP MASVS controls have no direct O-RAN WG11 Security Specification equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP MASVS and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

Of 8 total OWASP MASVS controls, 5 map directly to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP MASVS to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

3 OWASP MASVS controls have no direct equivalent in O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. The highest concentration of gaps is in Resilience and Anti-Tampering with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP MASVS and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

The domain with the highest gap count is Resilience and Anti-Tampering (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.