TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsNIST Privacy Framework

See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to NIST Privacy Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
32
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to NIST Privacy Framework with 18% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent Risk Profile.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight(4 mappings)

CAT-D1-2Risk management3 targets
→NISTPF-1Identify-P - Business Environment, Data Processing Inventory, Ecosystem, and Risk Assessment
→NISTPF-2Govern-P - Governance Policies, Risk Management Strategy, Awareness Training, and Monitoring
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
CAT-D1-4Training and culture
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls(4 mappings)

CAT-D3-1Preventative controls2 targets
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
CAT-D3-2Detective controls
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
CAT-D3-3Corrective controls
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Domain 4: External Dependency Management(2 mappings)

CAT-D4-3Third-party access controls2 targets
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience(2 mappings)

CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing2 targets
→NISTPF-6Protect-P Data Security (PR.DS-P)
→NISTPF-7Protect-P Maintenance and Protective Technology (PR.MA-P, PR.PT-P)

Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories(2 mappings)

CAT-IRP-4Organizational characteristics2 targets
→NISTPF-3Control-P - Privacy Controls, Data Management, and Disassociated Processing
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)

Maturity Levels(3 mappings)

CAT-ML-2Evolving3 targets
→NISTPF-1Identify-P - Business Environment, Data Processing Inventory, Ecosystem, and Risk Assessment
→NISTPF-2Govern-P - Governance Policies, Risk Management Strategy, Awareness Training, and Monitoring
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Related Comparisons

Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)12 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification11 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs ISO 27001:202211 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security10 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.010 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)10 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements9 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs Ghana Cybersecurity Act9 mappings

Other NIST Privacy Framework comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsVietnam PDPD vs NIST Privacy Framework6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs NIST Privacy Framework6 mappingsUSMCA Chapter 19 - Digital Trade (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) vs NIST Privacy Framework6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and NIST Privacy Framework?

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 49 controls across its framework, while NIST Privacy Framework covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent Risk Profile, where 5 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct NIST Privacy Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and NIST Privacy Framework?

Of 49 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 9 map directly to NIST Privacy Framework controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to NIST Privacy Framework?

40 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Privacy Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent Risk Profile with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and NIST Privacy Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent Risk Profile (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.