TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsNIST Privacy Framework

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to NIST Privacy Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

28
Controls Mapped
78
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to NIST Privacy Framework with 17% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 88 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

GV - Govern(10 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk3 targets
→NISTPF-1Identify-P - Business Environment, Data Processing Inventory, Ecosystem, and Risk Assessment
→NISTPF-2Govern-P - Governance Policies, Risk Management Strategy, Awareness Training, and Monitoring
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established3 targets
→NISTPF-1Identify-P - Business Environment, Data Processing Inventory, Ecosystem, and Risk Assessment
→NISTPF-2Govern-P - Governance Policies, Risk Management Strategy, Awareness Training, and Monitoring
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established3 targets
→NISTPF-1Identify-P - Business Environment, Data Processing Inventory, Ecosystem, and Risk Assessment
→NISTPF-2Govern-P - Governance Policies, Risk Management Strategy, Awareness Training, and Monitoring
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

ID - Identify(3 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NISTPF-1Identify-P - Business Environment, Data Processing Inventory, Ecosystem, and Risk Assessment
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk
→NISTPF-1Identify-P - Business Environment, Data Processing Inventory, Ecosystem, and Risk Assessment

PR - Protect(7 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed2 targets
→NISTPF-3Control-P - Privacy Controls, Data Management, and Disassociated Processing
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected2 targets
→NISTPF-6Protect-P Data Security (PR.DS-P)
→NISTPF-7Protect-P Maintenance and Protective Technology (PR.MA-P, PR.PT-P)

+8 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202282 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappings

Other NIST Privacy Framework comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsVietnam PDPD vs NIST Privacy Framework6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs NIST Privacy Framework6 mappingsUSMCA Chapter 19 - Digital Trade (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) vs NIST Privacy Framework6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST Privacy Framework?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while NIST Privacy Framework covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 24 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct NIST Privacy Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST Privacy Framework?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 18 map directly to NIST Privacy Framework controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 88 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to NIST Privacy Framework?

88 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Privacy Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST Privacy Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.