NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)vsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)
See exactly how NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls map to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) maps to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) with 60% coverage across 21 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Governance and Program Structure.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 45 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Technical Safeguards(20 mappings)
+25 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) comparisons
Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?
NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) has 35 controls across its framework, while NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 21 overlapping controls (60% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Governance and Program Structure, where 4 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls have no direct NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) equivalent.
How many controls map between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?
Of 35 total NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls, 21 map directly to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls — representing 60% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?
14 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls have no direct equivalent in NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). The highest concentration of gaps is in Governance and Program Structure with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Governance and Program Structure (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.