TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)vsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)

See exactly how NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls map to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
57%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) maps to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) with 57% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technical Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Technical Safeguards(10 mappings)

314.4(c)(1)Access controls
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
314.4(c)(3)Encryption requirements
→CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management
314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
314.4(c)(8)Monitoring and logging
→CSA-INF-03Security Monitoring and Logging
HIPAA-164.312(a)(1)Access control
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
HIPAA-164.312(d)Person or entity authentication
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
NYDFS-500.12Multi-Factor Authentication
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
NYDFS-500.13Asset Management and Data Governance
→CSA-DATA-01Data Classification and Handling
NYDFS-500.14Monitoring and Logging
→CSA-INF-03Security Monitoring and Logging
NYDFS-500.15Encryption of Nonpublic Information
→CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management

Class A Company Enhanced Requirements(2 mappings)

NYDFS-500-CLA-3Endpoint Detection and Response
→CSA-INF-03Security Monitoring and Logging
NYDFS-500-CLA-4Privileged Access Management
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management

Training and Awareness(2 mappings)

NYDFS-500.14cCybersecurity Awareness Training2 targets
→AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
→CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design

Incident Response and Notification(3 mappings)

NYDFS-500.16Incident Response and Business Continuity3 targets
→CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management
→CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Governance and Program Structure(3 mappings)

NYDFS-500.2bProgram Core Functions3 targets
→CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management
→CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) comparisons

NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) vs CSA CCM v422 mappingsNYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange22 mappingsNYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)21 mappingsNYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security21 mappingsNYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) vs Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)20 mappingsNYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 520 mappingsNYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) vs ISO 27001:202220 mappingsNYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation20 mappings

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)14 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)14 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsBIMCO Cyber Security vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)12 mappingsCAIQ (CSA) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)12 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) has 35 controls across its framework, while CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (57% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technical Safeguards, where 5 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls have no direct CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) equivalent.

How many controls map between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

Of 35 total NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls, 20 map directly to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls — representing 57% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

15 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls have no direct equivalent in CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). The highest concentration of gaps is in Technical Safeguards with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technical Safeguards (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.