Cross-Framework Mapping

NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)vsCSA CCM v4

See exactly how NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls map to CSA CCM v4. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

77
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
63%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) maps to CSA CCM v4 with 63% coverage across 22 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technical Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 77 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Technical Safeguards(20 mappings)

314.4(c)(1)Access controls3 targets
CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
314.4(c)(3)Encryption requirements3 targets
CSA-CEK-01Encryption and key management policy
CSA-CEK-18Key archival
CSA-LOG-10Encryption monitoring and reporting
314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication3 targets
CSA-IAM-02Strong password policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-14Strong authentication
CSA-IAM-15Passwords management
314.4(c)(8)Monitoring and logging3 targets
CSA-LOG-01Logging and monitoring policy
CSA-LOG-03Security monitoring and alerting
CSA-LOG-07Logging scope
HIPAA-164.312(a)(1)Access control3 targets
CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
HIPAA-164.312(d)Person or entity authentication3 targets
CSA-IAM-02Strong password policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-14Strong authentication
CSA-IAM-15Passwords management
NYDFS-500.12Multi-Factor Authentication2 targets
CSA-IAM-02Strong password policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-14Strong authentication

+57 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) comparisons

Other CSA CCM v4 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and CSA CCM v4?

NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) has 35 controls across its framework, while CSA CCM v4 covers 171 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 22 overlapping controls (63% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technical Safeguards, where 5 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls have no direct CSA CCM v4 equivalent.

How many controls map between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and CSA CCM v4?

Of 35 total NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls, 22 map directly to CSA CCM v4 controls — representing 63% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) to CSA CCM v4?

13 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls have no direct equivalent in CSA CCM v4. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technical Safeguards with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and CSA CCM v4?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technical Safeguards (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.