Cross-Framework Mapping

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)vsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)

See exactly how CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls map to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

38
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
67%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) maps to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) with 67% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Threat and Vulnerability Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 38 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Threat and Vulnerability Management(5 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment3 targets
NAIC-668-3Definitions
NAIC-668-4AISP Implementation
NAIC-ISP-02Risk Assessment
CSA-TVM-03Application Security (DevSecOps)2 targets
NAIC-668-4D4Secure Development
NAIC-ISP-03Security Measures

Data Security and Privacy(12 mappings)

CSA-DATA-01Data Classification and Handling
NAIC-ISP-03Security Measures
CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management3 targets
NAIC-668-3Definitions
NAIC-668-4D3Encryption
NAIC-ISP-03Security Measures
CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion2 targets
NAIC-668-5BInvestigation Scope
NAIC-TPM-02Cybersecurity Event Investigation
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design6 targets
Art. 19Consent Management Controls
CTDPA-1Definitions
NAIC-668-3Definitions
NAIC-668-4AISP Implementation
NAIC-668-6BNotification Content
NAIC-ISP-02Risk Assessment

Infrastructure and Operations Security(3 mappings)

CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management3 targets
BIPA-SEC5-1Biometric Identifier Definition
BIPA-SEC5-2Biometric Information Definition
NAIC-668-3Definitions

+18 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) has 15 controls across its framework, while NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (67% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Threat and Vulnerability Management, where 4 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) equivalent.

How many controls map between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

Of 15 total CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls, 10 map directly to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls — representing 67% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

5 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct equivalent in NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). The highest concentration of gaps is in Threat and Vulnerability Management with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Threat and Vulnerability Management (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.