Cross-Framework Mapping

NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)vsProposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)

See exactly how NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls map to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

41
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
57%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) maps to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) with 57% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technical Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 41 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Technical Safeguards(20 mappings)

314.4(c)(1)Access controls3 targets
EU-CRA-13Authentication and password management
EU-CRA-14Privileged access management
EU-CRA-15Access review and recertification
314.4(c)(3)Encryption requirements4 targets
EU-CRA-17Encryption of data at rest
EU-CRA-18Encryption of data in transit
EU-CRA-19Certificate management
EU-CRA-20Key lifecycle management
314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
EU-CRA-13Authentication and password management
314.4(c)(8)Monitoring and logging
EU-CRA-24Logging and monitoring
HIPAA-164.312(a)(1)Access control3 targets
EU-CRA-13Authentication and password management
EU-CRA-14Privileged access management
EU-CRA-15Access review and recertification
HIPAA-164.312(d)Person or entity authentication
EU-CRA-13Authentication and password management
NYDFS-500.12Multi-Factor Authentication
EU-CRA-13Authentication and password management
NYDFS-500.13Asset Management and Data Governance4 targets
EU-CRA-07Acceptable use of assets
EU-CRA-08Information classification and labeling
EU-CRA-09Asset handling procedures
EU-CRA-10Media management and disposal
NYDFS-500.14Monitoring and Logging
EU-CRA-24Logging and monitoring
NYDFS-500.15Encryption of Nonpublic Information
EU-CRA-17Encryption of data at rest

+21 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) comparisons

Other Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?

NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) has 35 controls across its framework, while Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (57% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technical Safeguards, where 5 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls have no direct Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) equivalent.

How many controls map between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?

Of 35 total NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls, 20 map directly to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls — representing 57% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?

15 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls have no direct equivalent in Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). The highest concentration of gaps is in Technical Safeguards with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technical Safeguards (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.