FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)
See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) with 36% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Reporting.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Incident Response and Reporting(16 mappings)
Purpose, Scope and Definitions(4 mappings)
+19 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons
Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?
FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 36 controls across its framework, while NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Reporting, where 10 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) equivalent.
How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?
Of 36 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 13 map directly to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?
23 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Reporting with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Reporting (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.