Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
41
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) with 5% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 48 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technological.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications(2 mappings)

27011-5.6Supplier relationships and telecom supply chain2 targets
AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criteria-1-2-Identity-Structure-Operations-Supply-Chain-Section-16-1a-16-1bAustralia MSA Mandatory Criteria 1 + 2 + Identity + Structure + Operations + Supply Chain + Section 16(1)(a) + (b)
AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-3-Modern-Slavery-Risks-Operations-Supply-Chain-Section-16-1c-Sector-Geographic-IndicatorsAustralia MSA Mandatory Criterion 3 + Modern Slavery Risks + Section 16(1)(c) + Sector + Geographic Indicators

Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)

27011-8.5Vulnerability and malware management
AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-4-Actions-Section-16-1d-Due-Diligence-Supplier-Code-Worker-Voice-Recruitment-FeesAustralia MSA Mandatory Criterion 4 + Actions + Section 16(1)(d) + Due Diligence + Supplier Code + Worker Voice + Recruitment Fees

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27011:2024 comparisons

Other Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 44 controls across its framework, while Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological, where 11 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

Of 44 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 2 map directly to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 48 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

48 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technological (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.