CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)
See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) with 26% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 414K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 414K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.
Account Security(6 mappings)
Data Security(2 mappings)
Governance & Training(3 mappings)
Governance and Training(3 mappings)
Vulnerability Management(1 mappings)
Supply Chain(2 mappings)
Supply Chain and Third Party(3 mappings)
+5 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 715 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons
Other Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 715 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (414K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?
CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 35 controls across its framework, while Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 8 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) equivalent.
How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?
Of 35 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 11 map directly to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?
28 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.