TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)vsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)

See exactly how OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls map to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) maps to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) with 50% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 6 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Metrics and Improvement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 6 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Culture and Organization(1 mappings)

DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance
→AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-4-Actions-Section-16-1d-Due-Diligence-Supplier-Code-Worker-Voice-Recruitment-FeesAustralia MSA Mandatory Criterion 4 + Actions + Section 16(1)(d) + Due Diligence + Supplier Code + Worker Voice + Recruitment Fees

Build and Deployment(2 mappings)

DSOMM-3Build, Deployment, Infrastructure Hardening, and Secrets Management2 targets
→AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criteria-1-2-Identity-Structure-Operations-Supply-Chain-Section-16-1a-16-1bAustralia MSA Mandatory Criteria 1 + 2 + Identity + Structure + Operations + Supply Chain + Section 16(1)(a) + (b)
→AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-3-Modern-Slavery-Risks-Operations-Supply-Chain-Section-16-1c-Sector-Geographic-IndicatorsAustralia MSA Mandatory Criterion 3 + Modern Slavery Risks + Section 16(1)(c) + Sector + Geographic Indicators

Test and Verification(2 mappings)

DSOMM-4Test and Verification - SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, Penetration Testing2 targets
→AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criteria-1-2-Identity-Structure-Operations-Supply-Chain-Section-16-1a-16-1bAustralia MSA Mandatory Criteria 1 + 2 + Identity + Structure + Operations + Supply Chain + Section 16(1)(a) + (b)
→AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-3-Modern-Slavery-Risks-Operations-Supply-Chain-Section-16-1c-Sector-Geographic-IndicatorsAustralia MSA Mandatory Criterion 3 + Modern Slavery Risks + Section 16(1)(c) + Sector + Geographic Indicators

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) comparisons

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs ISMAP (Japan)6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-1466 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-1456 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-1446 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs MTCS (Singapore)6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs Liechtenstein DPA5 mappings

Other Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) comparisons

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)3 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)3 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)3 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)2 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)2 mappingsUSMCA Chapter 19 - Digital Trade (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) vs Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)2 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)2 mappingsOWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 vs Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) has 6 controls across its framework, while Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Metrics and Improvement, where 1 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls have no direct Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

Of 6 total OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls, 3 map directly to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

3 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls have no direct equivalent in Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Metrics and Improvement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Metrics and Improvement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.