Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
39
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) with 9% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 51 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Business Continuity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 503K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 503K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.

Operational Risk Management Framework(1 mappings)

CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment
NAIC-668-3Definitions

Critical Operations(1 mappings)

CPS230-22Vulnerability and Gap Identification
MSA-16-1dCriterion 4: Actions Taken

Operations(2 mappings)

CPS230-27Incident Management2 targets
MSA-16-1bCriterion 2: Structure, Operations and Supply Chains
MSA-16-1cCriterion 3: Modern Slavery Risks

Business Continuity(2 mappings)

CPS230-27Incident Management2 targets
MSA-16-1bCriterion 2: Structure, Operations and Supply Chains
MSA-16-1cCriterion 3: Modern Slavery Risks

Service Provider Management(2 mappings)

CPS230-49Internal Audit of Service Providers2 targets
MSA-16-1bCriterion 2: Structure, Operations and Supply Chains
MSA-16-1cCriterion 3: Modern Slavery Risks

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons

Other Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 730 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (503K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 47 controls across its framework, while Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Business Continuity, where 11 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

Of 47 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 5 map directly to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 51 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

51 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Business Continuity with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Business Continuity (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.