TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsIEEE 1686

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to IEEE 1686. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
33
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to IEEE 1686 with 16% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technological.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications(4 mappings)

27011-5.3Segregation of duties
→IEEE1686-Section5.1-AccessControl-Accounts-Roles-Password-Session-RemoteIEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Electronic Access Account Management + Roles + Password + Failed Login + Session + Remote Access + Personnel
27011-5.6Supplier relationships and telecom supply chain3 targets
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills
→IEEE1686-Section5.5-5.6-5.7-5.8-Firmware-ConfigSW-TimeSync-DataAtRestIEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware Quality + Configuration Software Security + Time Synchronisation + Data Protection at Rest + Patch + Malware + Hardening + Vulnerability
→IEEE1686-SupplyChain-Documentation-Procurement-ComplianceTable-PhysicalIEEE 1686 Section 6 IED Security Documentation + Supply Chain + Procurement Specification + Appendix A Compliance Table + Physical and Tamper

People(1 mappings)

27011-6.3Awareness and Training
→IEEE1686-Section5.2-5.3-AuditLog-Retention-Export-MonitoringIEEE 1686 Section 5.2 + 5.3 - Audit Trail Records + Retention + Export + Supervisory Monitoring and Control + Network Security Monitoring

Clause 6: People Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)

27011-6.3Awareness and Training
→IEEE1686-Section5.2-5.3-AuditLog-Retention-Export-MonitoringIEEE 1686 Section 5.2 + 5.3 - Audit Trail Records + Retention + Export + Supervisory Monitoring and Control + Network Security Monitoring

Technological(1 mappings)

27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
→IEEE1686-Section5.1-AccessControl-Accounts-Roles-Password-Session-RemoteIEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Electronic Access Account Management + Roles + Password + Failed Login + Session + Remote Access + Personnel

Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications(4 mappings)

27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
→IEEE1686-Section5.1-AccessControl-Accounts-Roles-Password-Session-RemoteIEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Electronic Access Account Management + Roles + Password + Failed Login + Session + Remote Access + Personnel
27011-8.2Network security and segregation
→IEEE1686-Section5.2-5.3-AuditLog-Retention-Export-MonitoringIEEE 1686 Section 5.2 + 5.3 - Audit Trail Records + Retention + Export + Supervisory Monitoring and Control + Network Security Monitoring
27011-8.5Vulnerability and malware management
→IEEE1686-Section5.5-5.6-5.7-5.8-Firmware-ConfigSW-TimeSync-DataAtRestIEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware Quality + Configuration Software Security + Time Synchronisation + Data Protection at Rest + Patch + Malware + Hardening + Vulnerability
27011-8.6Data protection and backup
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27011:2024 comparisons

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs ISO 27002:202218 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)14 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security13 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 513 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs ISO/IEC 27400:202213 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs NIST Privacy Framework12 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs FedRAMP Rev 512 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappings

Other IEEE 1686 comparisons

IEC 62443 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs IEEE 16865 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IEEE 16865 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs IEEE 16865 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs IEEE 16865 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and IEEE 1686?

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 44 controls across its framework, while IEEE 1686 covers 7 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological, where 10 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct IEEE 1686 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and IEEE 1686?

Of 44 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 9 map directly to IEEE 1686 controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to IEEE 1686?

41 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in IEEE 1686. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and IEEE 1686?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technological (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.